Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
TESTING OPERATORS
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
!(true || true) vs !!!(true + true)
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
console.log('');
Tests:
!(true || true)
!(true || true)
!!!(true + true)
!!!(true + true)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
!(true || true)
!!!(true + true)
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll break down the benchmark and its test cases for you. **What is being tested?** The provided JSON represents two JavaScript microbenchmarks that compare different operator precedence rules in JavaScript. The benchmarks are designed to measure which approach yields better performance. The tests aim to evaluate the performance of three different operator precedence rules: 1. `!` (logical not): Negates its operand. 2. `(true || true)`: Uses the logical OR operator (`||`) to evaluate its operand. 3. `!!(true + true)`: Multiplies its operands and then applies the logical NOT operator (`!!`) to the result. **Options being compared** The two test cases compare the performance of these three different operator precedence rules: * `!(true || true)` * `!!!(true + true)` The first test case, `!(true || true)`, tests a more straightforward expression with a single logical OR operation. The second test case, `!!!(true + true)`, tests an expression that involves both multiplication and logical NOT operations. **Pros and Cons of each approach** 1. `!(true || true)`: * Pros: Simple and easy to understand. * Cons: May require more compiler optimizations to achieve optimal performance. 2. `!!(true + true)`: * Pros: Can take advantage of more advanced compiler optimizations, such as constant folding or dead code elimination. * Cons: Requires a deeper understanding of the operator precedence rules and may be more prone to errors. **Library usage** There is no specific library mentioned in the provided JSON. However, it's likely that the benchmarks are using built-in JavaScript functions or operators, which are part of the language standard. **Special JS feature or syntax** The test cases use a special feature of the JavaScript language: the logical OR operator (`||`) and the logical NOT operator (`!`). The `!!` notation is also used, which applies the logical NOT operator twice to its operand. This double negation idiom can sometimes be useful in certain situations. **Other alternatives** To write similar benchmarks, you could consider the following approaches: * Test other operator precedence rules, such as parentheses or commas. * Compare the performance of different compiler optimizations, like dead code elimination or constant folding. * Use a testing framework like Jest or Mocha to create more complex test cases and automate benchmarking. Keep in mind that microbenchmarks are typically designed to measure very specific aspects of performance, so it's essential to ensure that your benchmarks are relevant and representative of the problem you're trying to solve.
Related benchmarks:
The performance cost of try catch
test ` ` vs " "
_.isFunction vs typeof
with loggingbut better
Try/catch performance simple log 2
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?