Benchmark: Lodash sortBy vs orderBy (fixed)

HTML Preparation code:


<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

function getRandomInt(max) {
  return Math.floor(Math.random() * Math.floor(max));
}

var arr = [];
for(var i = 0; i < 100000; i++){
  arr.push({value:getRandomInt(100)});
}

Tests:

_.sortBy
_.sortBy(arr,"value");
_.orderBy
_.orderBy(arr,"value");

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
_.sortBy
_.orderBy

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

I'd be happy to explain the benchmark and its options.

**Benchmark Overview**

The benchmark measures the performance of two Lodash functions: `sortBy` and `orderBy`. Both functions are used to sort an array of objects based on a specific property ("value" in this case).

**Options Compared**

The two options being compared are:

1. `_.sortBy(arr, "value")`
2. `_.orderBy(arr, "value")`

Both functions take the same input (an array `arr` and a string key `"value"`). However, they differ in their implementation.

**Pros and Cons of Each Approach**

### _.sortBy

* **Pros:**
	+ More flexible, as it allows sorting in descending order by default
	+ Can handle arrays with duplicate keys
* **Cons:**
	+ May be slower due to the need to check for duplicate keys and adjust the sort order accordingly
	+ Requires more processing power to handle edge cases

### _.orderBy

* **Pros:**
	+ Faster, as it uses a simpler implementation that doesn't require checking for duplicate keys
	+ More efficient for large datasets
* **Cons:**
	+ Only works in ascending order by default (no option to sort in descending order)
	+ May not handle arrays with duplicate keys correctly

**Lodash Library and Its Purpose**

The Lodash library is a popular JavaScript utility library that provides a wide range of functions for tasks such as array manipulation, object creation, and more. In this benchmark, Lodash is used to provide the `sortBy` and `orderBy` functions.

The `_.sortBy` function sorts an array of objects based on a specific property (in this case, "value"). The `_._orderBy` function does essentially the same thing, but with some differences in implementation (as described above).

**Special JavaScript Feature or Syntax**

None are mentioned in the benchmark code. However, it's worth noting that Lodash uses a few advanced JavaScript features, such as:

* Closures (in the `getRandomInt` function)
* Functions (e.g., `_.sortBy`, `_._orderBy`)
* Object property access (e.g., `arr.push({value:getRandomInt(100)})`)

These features are not unusual in modern JavaScript code, but may require some familiarity with the language to understand.

**Alternatives**

If you're interested in alternative sorting libraries or implementations, here are a few options:

1. **Vanilla JavaScript:** You can implement your own sorting functions using basic JavaScript operations (e.g., `Array.prototype.sort()`).
2. **Other Lodash functions:** Lodash has many other useful functions for array manipulation and object creation. Some examples include `_filter()`, `_map()`, and `_reduce()`.
3. **External libraries:** There are many external libraries available that provide sorting functionality, such as the `lodash-sort` library or the `fast-sort` library.
4. **Custom implementations:** You can also implement your own sorting algorithms using standard computer science techniques (e.g., quicksort, mergesort).

Related benchmarks:

Lodash sortBy vs orderBy (fixed) (version: 0)

Lodash sortBy vs orderBy

Comparing performance of: _.sortBy vs _.orderBy

Created: 6 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

_.sortBy

_.orderBy

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):