Benchmark: jQuery old vs Vanilla JS GetID Speed Test

jQuery old vs Vanilla JS GetID Speed Test (version: 0)

Comparing speed of getting element by id with jQuery vs Vanilla JS

Comparing performance of: getElementById() vs getElementsByClassName() vs getElementsByTagName() vs querySelector(#id) vs querySelector(.id) vs querySelectorAll(#id) vs querySelectorAll(.id) vs jQuery(#id) vs jQuery(.id) vs jQuery(tag#id) vs jQuery(tag.id) vs jQuery + getElementById vs jQuery + getElementsByClassName vs jQuery + querySelectorAll

Created: 6 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.11.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<div id="foo" class="foo2"></div>

Tests:

getElementById()
var el = document.getElementById('foo'); var className = el.className;
getElementsByClassName()
var el = document.getElementsByClassName('foo2')[0]; var className = el.className;
getElementsByTagName()
var el = document.getElementsByTagName('div')[0]; var className = el.className;
querySelector(#id)
var el = document.querySelector('#foo'); var className = el.className;
querySelector(.id)
var el = document.querySelector('.foo2'); var className = el.className;
querySelectorAll(#id)
var el = document.querySelectorAll('#foo')[0]; var className = el.className;
querySelectorAll(.id)
var el = document.querySelectorAll('.foo2')[0]; var className = el.className;
jQuery(#id)
var el = $('#foo')[0]; var className = el.className;
jQuery(.id)
var el = $('.foo2')[0]; var className = el.className;
jQuery(tag#id)
var el = $('div#foo')[0]; var className = el.className;
jQuery(tag.id)
var el = $('div.foo2')[0]; var className = el.className;
jQuery + getElementById
var el = $(document.getElementById('foo'))[0]; var className = el.className;
jQuery + getElementsByClassName
var el = $(document.getElementsByClassName('foo2'))[0]; var className = el.className;
jQuery + querySelectorAll
var el = $(document.querySelectorAll('.foo2'))[0]; var className = el.className;

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
getElementById()
getElementsByClassName()
getElementsByTagName()
querySelector(#id)
querySelector(.id)
querySelectorAll(#id)
querySelectorAll(.id)
jQuery(#id)
jQuery(.id)
jQuery(tag#id)
jQuery(tag.id)
jQuery + getElementById
jQuery + getElementsByClassName
jQuery + querySelectorAll

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

It seems like you're providing a JSON-like string representing some kind of data. I'll help you parse it and extract insights.

The provided data appears to be a list of test results, each with the following properties:

1. `RawUAString`: A raw User Agent (UA) string from various browsers.
2. `Browser`: The browser name extracted from the `RawUAString`.
3. `DevicePlatform`: The device platform (Desktop in this case).
4. `OperatingSystem`: The operating system (Windows).
5. `ExecutionsPerSecond`: The number of executions per second for a specific test.
6. `TestName`: The name of the test.

There are 8 test results, each representing a different query or scenario:

1. `querySelector(#id)`
2. `jQuery + getElementById`
3. `querySelectorAll(.id)`
4. `jQuery(#id)`
5. `querySelectorAll(#id)`
6. `jQuery(.id)`
7. `jQuery(tag.id)`
8. `jQuery(tag#id)`

If you'd like, I can help you with:

* Identifying the most common browsers and their executions per second
* Finding the slowest test results
* Extracting insights from the data

Please let me know how I can assist you further!

Related benchmarks: