Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
find-iter-please
(version: 0)
test find iter against Array.find
Comparing performance of:
Array.find vs Iter find
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
async function find(it, f) { for await (let v of it) if (f(v)) return v; }
Tests:
Array.find
let found = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10].find(x => x == 800)
Iter find
let found = find([1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10], x => x == 800)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Array.find
Iter find
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to explain what's being tested in the provided JSON benchmark. **Overview** The benchmark compares two approaches for finding an element in an array: `Array.find` and `find` (a custom implementation). The test cases use JavaScript, which is a high-level programming language used for client-side scripting on the web. **Comparison of Array.find and custom find implementations** The two test cases are: 1. **Array.find**: This uses the built-in `Array.find()` method, which takes an optional callback function as its first argument. The callback function is called with each element in the array, and the first element that returns a truthy value from the callback is returned. 2. **Iter find** (custom implementation): This is the custom implementation of `find` provided in the benchmark code. It uses a for...of loop to iterate over the array, calling a provided function (`f`) on each element. If the function returns a truthy value, the corresponding element is returned. **Pros and Cons** 1. **Array.find**: * Pros: Built-in method, likely optimized for performance by the browser engine. * Cons: May have limitations in terms of supported data structures or edge cases. 2. **Iter find (custom implementation)**: * Pros: Allows for more control over iteration and callback functions, potentially leading to better performance in specific scenarios. * Cons: Requires manual iteration and handling of potential errors. **Other Considerations** * Both approaches rely on the presence of an element with a matching property value. If no such element exists, both methods will return `undefined`. * The custom implementation (`Iter find`) uses a for...of loop, which is designed for iterating over iterable objects like arrays. This may not work as expected if used with other types of data structures. **Library Usage** None of the test cases use any external libraries. However, it's worth noting that in real-world scenarios, you might need to consider using libraries or frameworks that provide optimized implementations of these methods or offer alternative approaches. **Special JS Features and Syntax** There are no specific JavaScript features or syntax used in this benchmark beyond what's inherent to the language itself. **Alternatives** If you're interested in exploring other alternatives for finding an element in an array, consider the following: * `Array.prototype.some()` (ECMAScript 2015): Similar to `Array.find()`, but returns as soon as it finds a match. * Using `indexOf()` or `lastIndexOf()` methods: These can be used with arrays and return the index of the first occurrence of an element, which you can then use to find the element. These alternatives may not offer the same level of control or performance as the custom implementation (`Iter find`) shown in this benchmark.
Related benchmarks:
find vs findIndex (Array prototype methods) 22
Array.find() vs Array.some()
find vs findIndex vs some (fork)
array.find and boolean cast or array.some
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?