Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Slice vs spread fxn
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Slice vs Spread
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Slice
var params = [ "foo", "bar", "baz" ]; var other = params.slice();
Spread
var params = [ "foo", "bar", "baz" ]; var other = [...params];
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Slice
Spread
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
**Benchmark Explanation** MeasureThat.net is used to compare the performance of two approaches: using the `slice()` method and using the spread operator (`...`). The test cases provided measure the execution time of creating an array copy from the original array `[ "foo", "bar", "baz" ]`. The purpose of this benchmark is to evaluate which approach is faster. **Options Compared** There are two options compared: 1. **`slice()` method**: This method creates a shallow copy of the original array. 2. **Spread operator (`...`)**: This syntax creates a new array by copying elements from the original array. **Pros and Cons** * **Slice() Method** + Pros: - Widely supported across browsers and versions. - Can be used for creating shallow copies of arrays, which can be beneficial in certain scenarios. + Cons: - May have performance implications due to its implementation specifics (e.g., it creates a new array object and then iterates over the original array). * **Spread Operator (`...`)** (introduced in ECMAScript 2015) + Pros: - More modern and efficient, as it uses the `Array.from()` method under the hood. - Can be used for creating deep copies of arrays (by using `Array.from()` with an iterator). + Cons: - May not be supported in older browsers or versions. - Requires a recent JavaScript engine to execute efficiently. **Library and Special JS Feature** There is no specific library mentioned in the benchmark definition. However, it's worth noting that `Array.prototype.slice()` and `Array.prototype.splice()` can be used together to achieve similar results. As for special JS features, there are none mentioned explicitly. The use of spread operator (`...`) is a modern JavaScript feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015. **Alternative Approaches** If the goal is to create an array copy, other alternatives could include: 1. **`Array.prototype.slice()`**: As mentioned earlier, this method creates a shallow copy of the original array. 2. **`Array.from()`**: This method can be used to create an array from an iterable (like an array) and can be more efficient than `slice()` for large datasets. 3. **`Array.prototype.concat()`**: Although not recommended for performance-critical code, this method creates a new array by copying elements from the original array. In summary, the MeasureThat.net benchmark provides a simple way to compare the performance of two approaches: using the `slice()` method and using the spread operator (`...`). Understanding the pros and cons of each approach can help developers choose the most efficient solution for their specific use cases.
Related benchmarks:
Array.prototype.slice vs spread operator 123
Array.prototype.slice vs spread operator.
Array.prototype.slice vs spread operator with length limit
arr.slice() vs spread operator
Array.prototype.slice vs spread operator With slightly bigger array
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?