Benchmark: lodash-method - MeasureThat.net

HTML Preparation code:


<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

var max2 = 10000000; // 10,000,000 (10 Million)
var arr2 = [];
for (var i = 0; i <= max2; i++) { arr2.push({key:i, value:i}); }

Tests:

1
_.each(arr2, item => item.value === 1)
2
_.groupBy(arr2, 'id')

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
1
2

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Measuring performance is crucial in software development, and benchmarks like MeasuringThat.net help identify areas for improvement.

Let's break down the benchmark definition JSON:

**Script Preparation Code:**
```javascript
var max2 = 10000000; // 10,000,000 (10 Million)
var arr2 = [];
for (var i = 0; i <= max2; i++) {
    arr2.push({key:i, value:i});
}
```
The script creates an array `arr2` with 10 million elements, each containing a unique key-value pair. This is likely used as the input for the benchmark tests.

**HTML Preparation Code:**
```html
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
```
This code includes the Lodash library, which provides a set of functional programming helpers, including `_.each` and `_.groupBy`.

Now, let's analyze the individual test cases:

**Test Case 1:** `_._each(arr2, item => item.value === 1)`

* This test uses the `_.each` function from Lodash to iterate over the `arr2` array.
* The callback function checks if each element's value is equal to 1.

**Test Case 2:** `_._groupBy(arr2, 'id')`

* This test uses the `_.groupBy` function from Lodash to group the elements of `arr2` by their `id` property.

Now, let's discuss the options compared:

**Option 1: Vanilla JavaScript**
```javascript
for (var i = 0; i < arr2.length; i++) {
    if (arr2[i].value === 1) {
        // do something
    }
}
```
* Pros:
	+ No additional library dependencies.
	+ Simple and straightforward implementation.
* Cons:
	+ More verbose and error-prone.
	+ Lacks the convenience of functional programming.

**Option 2: Lodash's _.each**
```javascript
_.each(arr2, item => item.value === 1);
```
* Pros:
	+ Provides a convenient and concise way to iterate over arrays.
	+ Part of a larger library with other useful utilities.
* Cons:
	+ Requires including the Lodash library.
	+ May not be suitable for all use cases (e.g., very large datasets).

**Option 3: Lodash's _.groupBy**
```javascript
_.groupBy(arr2, 'id');
```
* Pros:
	+ Efficiently groups elements by a common property.
	+ Can lead to more concise and readable code.
* Cons:
	+ Requires including the Lodash library.
	+ May not be suitable for all use cases (e.g., very large datasets).

Now, let's consider special JavaScript features or syntax:

In this benchmark, no special JavaScript features or syntax are used beyond what is standard.

Other alternatives to MeasuringThat.net include:

1. Benchmarking libraries like `benchmark.js` and `fast-metrics`.
2. Online code review platforms that provide automated performance testing.
3. In-house custom benchmarks created using your own tools and methodologies.

Keep in mind that the best benchmarking approach often depends on the specific use case, programming language, and requirements of your project.

Related benchmarks:

lodash-method (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: 1 vs 2

Created: 6 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

1

2

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):