Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
var vs let vs const performace4
(version: 2)
Comparing performance of:
Var vs Let vs Const
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Var
const nums = [55, 21, 807, 41, 56, 66, 202]; for(var x = 0, l = nums.length; x < l; ++x) {var a=nums[x]; console.log(a); }
Let
const nums = [55, 21, 807, 41, 56, 66, 202]; for(let x = 0, l = nums.length; x < l; ++x) {let a=nums[x]; console.log(a); }
Const
const nums = [55, 21, 807, 41, 56, 66, 202]; for(let x = 0, l = nums.length; x < l; ++x) {const a=nums[x]; console.log(a); }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Var
Let
Const
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
**What is being tested?** MeasureThat.net is testing the performance of three different variable declarations: `var`, `let`, and `const`. The tests are designed to measure how these variables affect the execution speed of a simple loop that iterates over an array. **Options compared:** * `var`: A non-block-scoped, mutable variable declaration. * `let`: A block-scoped, mutable variable declaration. * `const`: A block-scoped, immutable variable declaration. **Pros and Cons:** * **`var`**: + Pros: Widely supported across older browsers. However, it's not safe for use with strict mode due to its behavior in hoisting. + Cons: Not safe for mutable variables that need to be accessed outside a block, as it can lead to unexpected behavior (e.g., variable "hiding"). * **`let`**: + Pros: Block-scoped and safe for use with modern JavaScript features. However, it's not supported in older browsers. + Cons: Not suitable for variables that need to be accessed outside a block. * **`const`**: + Pros: Immutable and block-scoped, making it safer than `var`. Also widely supported across modern browsers. + Cons: Variables declared with `const` cannot be reassigned. **Library usage:** None of the test cases use any external libraries. The benchmarking code is self-contained within each test case. **Special JavaScript features or syntax:** * None mentioned in the provided benchmark definition. However, it's worth noting that some newer JavaScript versions (e.g., ECMAScript 2020) introduce new features like `optional chaining` (`?.`) and `nullish coalescing` (`??`). These are not used in this benchmark. **Alternative approaches:** Other approaches to testing variable declarations could include: * Using a virtual machine or interpreter, such as V8 (Google's JavaScript engine) or SpiderMonkey (Mozilla's JavaScript engine), to run the benchmarks. * Writing test cases for specific use cases, like error handling or concurrency scenarios, where variable declarations might have different performance characteristics. * Comparing the performance of `var`, `let`, and `const` in real-world applications or frameworks that rely on these variables. Keep in mind that MeasureThat.net is a specialized benchmarking tool focused on comparing JavaScript microbenchmarks.
Related benchmarks:
Var vs Let
var vs. const vs. let
var vs let vs const init
let vs const in tight loops
var vs const vs let
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?