Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Array.prototype.concat and Spread Operator
(version: 0)
Compare the new ES6 spread operator with the traditional concat() method
Comparing performance of:
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Array.prototype.concat
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]; var other = [ 1, 2 ].concat(params);
spread operator
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ] var other = [ 1, 2, ...params ]
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Array.prototype.concat
spread operator
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and its test cases. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark compares the performance of two approaches for merging arrays in JavaScript: the traditional `concat()` method and the new ES6 spread operator (`...`). **Options Compared** The benchmark tests the following options: 1. **Traditional Concat Method**: The `concat()` method is used to merge two or more arrays. 2. **Spread Operator**: The spread operator (`...`) is used to create a new array by spreading elements from an existing array. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** * **Traditional Concat Method**: + Pros: widely supported, easy to understand, and implement. + Cons: can be slower than the spread operator, as it creates a new intermediate array. * **Spread Operator**: + Pros: faster than the traditional concat method, as it avoids creating an intermediate array. + Cons: only available in modern browsers (not supported in older versions of Internet Explorer), and may not work in all environments. **Library Used** There is no library explicitly mentioned in the benchmark. However, the spread operator uses a JavaScript feature that is part of the language itself, without relying on any external libraries. **Special JS Feature/ Syntax** The benchmark uses the new ES6 spread operator (`...`), which was introduced as a proposal for standardization and later adopted by browsers. This syntax allows for creating new arrays by spreading elements from an existing array. **Benchmark Preparation Code and Description** The preparation code is empty, meaning that no special setup or initialization is required before running the benchmark. The description mentions that two test cases are compared: one using the traditional `concat()` method and another using the spread operator. **Alternative Benchmarks** If you want to create a similar benchmark for other array merging methods in JavaScript, here are some alternatives: 1. Using `Array.prototype.push()`: This approach uses the `push()` method to add elements to an existing array. 2. Using `Array.prototype.splice()`: This approach uses the `splice()` method to remove and replace elements in an existing array. 3. Using a library like Lodash's `mergeArrays()`: This approach relies on a third-party library that provides a more efficient way of merging arrays. Keep in mind that each approach has its pros and cons, and choosing the right one depends on your specific use case and requirements.
Related benchmarks:
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator
concat 2 arrays: Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator (fix)
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator real
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator on small array
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?