Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Object.assign vs spread operator no $query
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Object.assign vs spread operator
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Object.assign
var params = { b:"hello", c: true, d:7 }; var other = Object.assign({ a: 2 }, params);
spread operator
var params = { b:"hello", c: true, d:7 }; var other = { a: 2, ...params };
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Object.assign
spread operator
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared options, pros and cons, and other considerations. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark compares the performance of `Object.assign` with the spread operator (`...`) in JavaScript. The test case uses an object literal to create a new object, assigning some properties from another object using either `Object.assign` or the spread operator. **Options Compared** Two options are compared: 1. **Object.assign**: A built-in JavaScript method that copies the values of all enumerable own properties from one or more source objects to a target object. 2. **Spread Operator (`...`)**: A syntax feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6) that allows spreading the properties of an object onto another object. **Pros and Cons** **Object.assign:** Pros: * Widely supported across browsers and Node.js versions * Easy to read and understand for developers familiar with the method Cons: * May be slower than the spread operator due to the overhead of calling a built-in function * Can lead to unexpected behavior if not used carefully (e.g., when dealing with null or undefined values) **Spread Operator (`...`):** Pros: * Often faster than `Object.assign` due to its inline syntax and reduced overhead * More concise and expressive for simple object assignments Cons: * May not be supported in older browsers or Node.js versions * Can lead to confusion if not used carefully (e.g., when dealing with nested objects) **Other Considerations** * The benchmark uses the same test case for both options, which means the results may not reflect real-world usage scenarios. In a real-world application, you might need to assign properties from an object in different ways. * The benchmark does not account for edge cases, such as null or undefined values, which can affect performance. **Library Usage** None of the test cases use any external libraries. **Special JS Features/Syntax** The spread operator (`...`) is a special feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). It allows spreading the properties of an object onto another object using the syntax `obj {...other}`. This feature is not supported in older browsers or Node.js versions. **Alternative Approaches** Other approaches to achieve similar results could include: * Using the `merge` function from libraries like Lodash or Underscore * Implementing a custom merge function * Using template literals with object literal syntax (e.g., `${obj} { ...other }`) Keep in mind that these alternatives may introduce additional overhead, dependencies, or complexity compared to using the spread operator or `Object.assign`.
Related benchmarks:
Object.assign vs spread operator without jquery
object.assign vs spread to create a copy
JavaScript spread operator vs Object.assign performance - Kien Nguyen
Object.assign() vs spread operator (New object)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?