Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Check for empty string (only whitespaces)
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
.trim() vs regex
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var str = ' \n\t hello world \n\n'; var regex = /$\s*$/;
Tests:
.trim()
str.trim().length === 0
regex
regex.test(str)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
.trim()
regex
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and its test cases. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark is designed to measure the performance of JavaScript strings, specifically focusing on two aspects: string trimming and regular expression testing. The benchmark provides a prepared script and HTML code that can be used to create a simple web page for running the tests. **Test Cases** There are two test cases in this benchmark: 1. **`.trim()`**: This test case checks the length of the trimmed string. The idea is to measure how fast JavaScript engines can trim an empty string by removing leading and trailing whitespaces. 2. **`regex.test(str)`**: This test case tests the regular expression `/$\\s*$/` on a given string. The regular expression attempts to match any whitespace character at the end of the string. **Options Compared** In this benchmark, two main options are compared: 1. **`.trim()`**: A built-in JavaScript method for removing leading and trailing whitespaces from a string. 2. **Regular Expression (`regex`)**: A string pattern used to test if a specific regular expression matches the given string. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** **`.trim()`**: Pros: * Simple and straightforward * Works well for empty strings with only whitespace characters * Built-in JavaScript method, so it's widely supported Cons: * May not work as expected on non-ASCII strings (e.g., Unicode characters) * Can be slower than regular expression testing for longer strings **Regular Expression (`regex`)**: Pros: * Flexible and can handle more complex string patterns * Works well with non-ASCII strings and Unicode characters * Can be faster than `.trim()` for longer strings due to optimized engine implementation Cons: * More verbose and harder to read, especially for complex patterns * May have performance issues on older browsers or engines that don't support the regular expression engine **Library Usage** In this benchmark, a library is used to create a simple web page for running the tests. However, no specific JavaScript library is mentioned in the provided information. **Special JS Features/Syntax** None of the test cases explicitly use any special JavaScript features or syntax. The tests focus on basic string manipulation and regular expression testing. **Other Alternatives** If you want to create similar benchmarks, consider using other popular testing frameworks or libraries for JavaScript, such as: * Jest * Mocha * Chai * Cypress Keep in mind that these alternatives might have different strengths and weaknesses compared to MeasureThat.net's approach.
Related benchmarks:
Regex testing for whitespace vs trim
Regex testing whitespace vs trim
RegEx.test new line 2
Detecting an Empty or Whitespace String using RegEx vs trim
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?