Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
template + subtrings vs Regex
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Template + subtring vs Regex
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var nowTime = '120102'
Tests:
Template + subtring
`${nowTime.substring(0,2)}:${nowTime.substring(2,4)}:${nowTime.substring(4,6)}`
Regex
nowTime.replace(/(\d{2,2})(\d{2,2})(\d{2,2})/, '$1:$2:$3')
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Template + subtring
Regex
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark and its options. **Benchmark Description** The benchmark compares two approaches to format a specific date string: using template literals (Template + Substrings) versus using regular expressions (Regex). **Options Compared** 1. **Template Literals (Template + Substrings)**: This approach uses template literals to extract the first 2, then 2, and last 2 characters from the `nowTime` string. 2. **Regular Expressions (Regex)**: This approach uses a regular expression to match the first 2, then 2, and last 2 digits of the `nowTime` string. **Pros and Cons** * **Template Literals**: + Pros: Easy to read and understand, efficient, and reliable. + Cons: May not be as performant as Regex for large inputs or complex patterns. * **Regex**: + Pros: Can handle complex patterns and regular expressions, potentially faster for large inputs. + Cons: More prone to errors and security vulnerabilities if not used carefully. May require more characters in the input string. **Library/Tool Used** None explicitly mentioned. However, `String.prototype.substring()` is a built-in JavaScript method that extracts a part of a string. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** None explicitly mentioned. However, template literals (`${...}`) are a relatively modern feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). **Other Considerations** * Performance: Regex can be slower than template literals for small inputs due to the overhead of compiling regular expressions. * Readability and maintainability: Template literals are generally easier to read and understand, especially for simple cases. Regex patterns can become complex and hard to read for large or complex patterns. **Alternatives** Other approaches that could be considered: * Using `String.prototype.split()` and concatenating the parts * Using a custom function with a loop to extract the desired characters * Using a library like Moment.js, which provides a date formatting API Keep in mind that these alternatives may not be as efficient or readable as the original template literal approach.
Related benchmarks:
Date rounding via regexp replace vs Math.floor
split vs replace
split vs replace v2
split1 vs regex
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?