Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
null tests
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
is vs ===
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
is
var x = null; x === null;
===
var x = null; Object.is(x, null);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
is
===
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to explain the benchmark and its various aspects. **Benchmark Overview** The provided JSON represents a simple JavaScript microbenchmarking test case, which measures the performance of two different approaches for checking if a variable is equal to null. There are no specific libraries or special features mentioned in the JSON. **Options Compared** In this benchmark, two options are compared: 1. **"is"`**: This option uses the `===` operator (strict equality) and checks if the variable `x` is strictly equal to null. 2. **"=="**: This option uses the `==` operator (loose equality) and checks if the value of `x` is equal to null. **Pros and Cons** Here are some pros and cons associated with each approach: * **"is"`: * Pros: * Provides more accurate results, as it checks for strict equality. * Less susceptible to type coercion issues. * Cons: * May be slower due to the strict equality check. * `"=="` * Pros: * Faster, since it only checks if the value is equal to null. * Cons: * More prone to type coercion issues and false positives. * Less accurate results compared to "is". **Library and Special Features** In this benchmark, no specific libraries or special features are mentioned. The tests rely solely on built-in JavaScript functionality. **Other Alternatives** If you want to compare the performance of different approaches for checking if a variable is not equal to null, you can consider using: 1. `!==` 2. `!=` These operators perform non-strict equality checks and may have varying levels of performance depending on your specific use case. **Benchmark Preparation Code** The provided JSON includes no script preparation code or HTML preparation code, which means that the tests are likely self-contained and do not require any additional setup. In summary, this benchmark measures the performance difference between using strict equality (`===`) and loose equality (`==`) for checking if a variable is equal to null. The results indicate that "is" (strict equality) is more accurate but slightly slower than "==".
Related benchmarks:
Comparing null with ==, ===, and Object.is()
Nullish coalescing vs logical OR operators
Nullish coalescing vs if-chains
Compare typeof vs null check 2
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?