Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
_.sortBy vs _.orderBy
(version: 0)
Lodash sortBy vs orderBy
Comparing performance of:
_.sortBy vs _.orderBy
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
Script Preparation code:
function getRandomInt(max) { return Math.floor(Math.random() * Math.floor(max)); } var arr = []; for(var i = 0; i < 100000; i++){ arr.push({value:getRandomInt(100)}); }
Tests:
_.sortBy
_.sortBy(arr,"value");
_.orderBy
_.orderBy(arr,"value");
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
_.sortBy
_.orderBy
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the benchmark and analyze what's being tested. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark is comparing two functions from the Lodash library: `_.sortBy` and `_.orderBy`. These functions are used to sort arrays in ascending or descending order, respectively. The benchmark aims to measure the performance difference between these two functions. **Options Compared** The two options being compared are: 1. `_.sortBy(arr,"value")`: This function sorts the array `arr` in ascending order based on the "value" property of each object in the array. 2. `_.orderBy(arr,"value")`: This function also sorts the array `arr` in ascending order, but it uses a different sorting algorithm than `_sortBy`. **Pros and Cons** Here are some pros and cons of each approach: * `_.sortBy`: + Pros: Generally faster and more efficient for large datasets. + Cons: May have issues with NaN (Not a Number) values or objects with non-comparable properties. * `_.orderBy`: + Pros: More robust handling of edge cases, including NaN values and objects with non-comparable properties. + Cons: May be slower than `_sortBy` for large datasets. **Library: Lodash** Lodash is a popular JavaScript library that provides a collection of functional programming helpers. The `_.sortBy` and `_.orderBy` functions are part of the Lodash utility belt, which makes them easily accessible in your codebase. By using Lodash, you can focus on writing your main logic without worrying about implementing sorting algorithms from scratch. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** There doesn't seem to be any special JavaScript feature or syntax being tested in this benchmark. However, the use of Lodash and its utility functions is a common pattern in JavaScript development, so it's worth noting that. **Other Alternatives** If you're looking for alternative sorting algorithms or libraries, here are some options: * **Native Array.sort()**: This method sorts an array in-place using the built-in sorting algorithm. * **Moment.js**: A popular date and time library that includes a sorting function for dates. * **Underscore.js**: Another utility library that provides sorting functions, similar to Lodash. For larger-scale applications or performance-critical code, you may want to consider native Array.sort() or a custom implementation. For smaller projects or scripts, Lodash's sorting functions might be sufficient and convenient. Overall, the benchmark is providing valuable insights into the relative performance of `_.sortBy` and `_.orderBy`, allowing developers to make informed decisions about their choice of sorting algorithm in different scenarios.
Related benchmarks:
Lodash orderBy vs array.prototype.sort
Lodash orderBy() vs array.prototype.sort
Lodash sortBy vs orderBy performance
Lodash orderBy vs array.prototype.sort fork
Lodash orderBy (fn) vs array.prototype.sort small array
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?