Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Slice vs Spread ttt
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
slice() vs spread
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
slice()
var params = Array(1000).fill(null); var other = params.slice();
spread
var params = Array(1000).fill(null); var other = [ ...params ];
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
slice()
spread
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Measuring JavaScript performance is crucial for optimizing code and improving user experience. **What's being tested?** The provided benchmark compares two approaches to create an array slice or spread: `slice()` and the spread operator (`[ ...params ]`). **Slice vs Spread: What's the difference?** 1. **Slice**: The `slice()` method returns a shallow copy of a portion of an array. It takes three arguments: the start index, the end index (exclusive), and the step value. In this benchmark, it creates a new array with 1000 null values using `Array(1000).fill(null)`. 2. **Spread**: The spread operator (`[ ...params ]`) is used to create a new array by spreading an existing array's elements. It doesn't require any additional arguments. **Options compared:** The benchmark compares the performance of two approaches: 1. **Slice (`.slice()`)**: Creates a shallow copy of the original array. 2. **Spread (`[ ...params ]`)**: Creates a new array by spreading the existing array's elements. **Pros and Cons:** **Slice (.slice())** Pros: * Portable across older browsers that don't support spread syntax. * Can be used to create a portion of an array without modifying the original array. Cons: * May incur additional overhead due to creating a shallow copy. * Can lead to memory allocation issues if working with large arrays. **Spread ([ ...params ])** Pros: * More efficient than `slice()` since it doesn't involve copying the entire array. * Simplifies code and reduces verbosity. Cons: * Requires support for spread syntax in older browsers (Chrome 79 is required for this benchmark). * May not be suitable for older browsers or environments that don't understand the spread operator. **Library/Function usage:** None of the provided test cases use any libraries or functions beyond basic JavaScript. However, it's worth noting that some benchmarks might include libraries like Lodash or Ramda to simplify or optimize performance tests. **Special JS feature/syntax:** The benchmark uses a new syntax for array creation (the spread operator `[ ...params ]`). This is a relatively recent feature in JavaScript (introduced in ECMAScript 2015). The `slice()` method has been part of the language since its inception. **Other alternatives:** If you need to compare performance between different array manipulation methods, consider adding more test cases that use other approaches, such as: * `concat()` * `push/pop()` * `forEach()` * `reduce()` These additions can provide a more comprehensive understanding of the trade-offs involved in choosing an optimal array manipulation method.
Related benchmarks:
Array.prototype.slice vs spread operator 123
Array.prototype.slice vs spread operator.
Array.prototype.slice vs spread operator with length limit
Array.prototype.slice vs spread operator With slightly bigger array
Array.prototype.slice vs spread operator 73 3
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?