Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
createElement vs cloneNode shallow2
(version: 0)
Faster way to create new dom elements before insertion
Comparing performance of:
createElement vs cloneNode
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
createElement
var list = [], n = 0; while(true) { n++; list.push(document.createElement('div')); if(n===100000) break; }
cloneNode
var list = [], n = 0, node = document.createElement('div'); while(true) { n++; list.push(node.cloneNode(false)); if(n===100000) break; }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
createElement
cloneNode
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down what is being tested in the provided benchmark. The test compares two approaches to create new DOM elements: 1. `createElement`: This method creates a new DOM element from scratch using the `document.createElement` function. The newly created element is then pushed into an array (`list`). This approach requires creating a new DOM node, which can be resource-intensive. 2. `cloneNode shallow2`: This method uses the `cloneNode` function to create a copy of an existing DOM element (in this case, a `div` element) and pushes it into the same array as before. The `shallow2` part refers to the second parameter of the `cloneNode` function, which indicates whether the cloned node should be shallowly cloned or not. Now, let's discuss the pros and cons of each approach: **createElement** Pros: * Creates a new, unique DOM element that doesn't share any properties with existing elements. * May be more suitable for scenarios where you need to attach event listeners or styles that don't depend on existing elements. Cons: * Can be resource-intensive due to the overhead of creating a new DOM node. * May require more memory allocation if you're pushing many elements into an array. **cloneNode shallow2** Pros: * Creates a copy of an existing DOM element, which can be faster and more efficient than creating a new one from scratch. * Can be useful when working with a large number of elements that share similar properties or behavior. Cons: * Creates a cloned node that is attached to the same parent node as the original element. This means that both the original and cloned nodes will have their own event listeners, styles, etc., which can lead to conflicts. * May not be suitable for scenarios where you need to attach unique event listeners or styles to each element. Other considerations: * In modern browsers, `cloneNode` is optimized to create shallow clones of elements. If you're using a deeper clone (e.g., with `cloneNode(true)`), the performance difference between `createElement` and `cloneNode` may not be as significant. * The test case uses an array (`list`) to store the created DOM elements. This can lead to memory allocation issues if you push many elements into the array. Library/Library Purpose: There is no library mentioned in the provided benchmark definition. Special JS feature/Syntax: There are no special JS features or syntax mentioned in the provided benchmark definition. Alternative approaches: * If you need to create a new DOM element that doesn't share any properties with existing elements, `createElement` might be the better choice. * If you're working with a large number of elements that share similar properties or behavior, `cloneNode shallow2` might be a more efficient approach. However, consider using a deeper clone if you need to attach unique event listeners or styles to each element. Keep in mind that these are general guidelines and the best choice ultimately depends on your specific use case and performance requirements.
Related benchmarks:
createElement vs cloneNode shallow
createElement vs cloneNode v3
createElement vs deep cloneNode vs cloneNode
cloneNode vs createElement
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?