Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
xhr json parse manual vs automatic
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
manual parse vs automatic parse
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
function showResult(data) { console.log(data); } var newUrl = "https://www.googleapis.com/discovery/v1/apis";
Tests:
manual parse
var xhr = new XMLHttpRequest(); xhr.onload = data => showResult(JSON.parse(xhr.responseText)); xhr.open('GET', newUrl, true); xhr.send();
automatic parse
var xhr = new XMLHttpRequest(); xhr.responseType = 'json'; xhr.onload = data => showResult(xhr.response); xhr.open('GET', newUrl, true); xhr.send();
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
manual parse
automatic parse
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks. **Benchmark Overview** The provided benchmark measures the performance difference between two approaches to parsing JSON data from an XMLHttpRequest (XHR) object in a web browser. The test cases compare the manual and automatic parsing methods, which are used to retrieve data from a remote server. **Manual Parsing vs Automatic Parsing** ### Manual Parsing In this approach, the developer is responsible for manually parsing the response text as JSON using the `JSON.parse()` method. This involves: 1. Converting the response text to a string 2. Passing the string to `JSON.parse()` 3. Handling any potential errors that may occur during parsing The manual parsing approach requires more control over the parsing process, but it can be slower and more error-prone. Pros: * More control over the parsing process * Can handle custom JSON parsing logic Cons: * Slower due to manual string-to-JSON conversion * Error-prone if not handled correctly ### Automatic Parsing (with `responseType`) The other approach uses the `XMLHttpRequest` object's `responseType` property to automatically parse the response data as JSON. This involves setting the `responseType` to `'json'` before sending the request. In this case, the browser takes care of parsing the response data for you, which can be faster and more efficient. Pros: * Faster due to automatic parsing * Less error-prone Cons: * Requires a modern browser that supports `responseType` * May not work as expected in older browsers or with non-standard JSON data **Library Usage** In both test cases, the `JSON.parse()` method is used to parse the response data. The `JSON` object is a built-in JavaScript library that provides methods for parsing and generating JSON data. The `XMLHttpRequest` object also relies on this library to handle JSON response data. **Special JS Features/Syntax** None of the provided benchmark test cases use any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond what's commonly used in web development (e.g., ES6+ syntax, async/await, etc.). **Other Alternatives** If you're interested in exploring other alternatives for parsing JSON data in a web browser, here are some options: 1. **`JSON.parse()` with a custom callback**: Instead of using the `responseType` property, you can pass a callback function to `JSON.parse()` to handle the parsed data. 2. **Third-party libraries**: Libraries like `json-js`, `json2`, or `js-jod` provide additional features and optimizations for parsing JSON data in web applications. 3. **Custom JSON parsers**: You can write your own custom JSON parser using JavaScript and handle specific edge cases or requirements that aren't covered by built-in libraries. Keep in mind that each alternative has its pros and cons, which should be carefully considered based on the specific use case and requirements of your project.
Related benchmarks:
XHR vs fetch
xhr vs fetch send
xhr vs fetch perf
XHR vs fetch without JSON parsing
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?