Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
ffasdffdf
(version: 0)
afsdfdf
Comparing performance of:
qwer vs tyuu
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
qwer
var reg = /foo/gi; var str = "foo...foo...abc...foo"; for (var i = 0; i < 100; i++) { str.match(reg); }
tyuu
var str = "foo...foo...abc...foo"; for (var i = 0; i < 100; i++) { str.match(/foo/gi); }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
qwer
tyuu
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to explain what's being tested in the provided JSON benchmark. **Script Preparation Code** In this case, there is no script preparation code specified for either test case. This means that the JavaScript interpreter or engine will execute the script directly without any modifications or optimizations applied beforehand. **Options Compared** The two test cases compare different approaches to executing a regular expression (regex) pattern on a string: 1. **Test Case 1**: `var reg = /foo/gi; var str = "foo...foo...abc...foo"; for (var i = 0; i < 100; i++) { str.match(reg); }` 2. **Test Case 2**: `\r\n var str = "foo...foo...abc...foo"; \r\n for (var i = 0; i < 100; i++) { \r\n str.match(/foo/gi);\r\n }` In both cases, the regex pattern is identical: `/foo/gi`. The main difference lies in how the pattern is defined and accessed: * In Test Case 1, the regex pattern is defined using a JavaScript variable `reg`. * In Test Case 2, the regex pattern is defined directly as a string `\r\n /foo/gi \r\n`, which is not a valid way to define a regex pattern in JavaScript. **Pros and Cons** **Test Case 1:** Pros: * Uses a standard JavaScript approach to defining and executing the regex pattern. * Allows for easy reuse of the regex pattern in other parts of the code. Cons: * The regex pattern needs to be defined before it's used, which can lead to additional overhead if it's not frequently reused. **Test Case 2:** Pros: * None apparent, as this approach is invalid and not recommended. Cons: * This approach is not valid JavaScript syntax and will likely result in errors. * It may also lead to performance issues due to the unnecessary overhead of parsing an invalid regex pattern. **Other Considerations** In general, when executing a regex pattern on a string, it's often beneficial to cache the results or reuse the regex pattern across multiple executions to minimize overhead. However, this is not explicitly tested in either benchmark. **Library Usage** None of the test cases use any external libraries, but the `String.prototype.match()` method is used in both cases. This is a built-in JavaScript method that returns an array containing all matches of the regex pattern within the string. **Special JS Features or Syntax** There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in either benchmark. The focus is on comparing different approaches to executing a regex pattern. **Alternatives** Other alternatives for testing regex performance might include: * Using a custom implementation of the `String.prototype.match()` method to control execution timing. * Using a caching mechanism to store and reuse compiled regex patterns. * Comparing different JavaScript engines or implementations (e.g., V8, SpiderMonkey, etc.) on various platforms. In summary, the provided benchmark compares two approaches to executing a regex pattern on a string: one using a standard JavaScript variable to define the pattern, and another using an invalid syntax. The test cases highlight the importance of using valid and efficient methods for executing regex patterns in JavaScript.
Related benchmarks:
safdfsda
Word width calculation speed
Rafa speed test 1
7894549846549843546846549844
Object access method
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?