Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Lodash isEqual vs Native JS Equality with Array values
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Lodash isEqual vs JS equality vs Lodash !isEqual vs JS !equality
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/lodash@4.17.15/lodash.min.js"></script>
Script Preparation code:
var changes = { propertyName: { currentValue: [4], previousValue: [4] } };
Tests:
Lodash isEqual
_.isEqual(changes["propertyName"].currentValue, changes["propertyName"].previousValue)
JS equality
changes["propertyName"].currentValue === changes["propertyName"].previousValue
Lodash !isEqual
!(_.isEqual(changes["propertyName"].currentValue, changes["propertyName"].previousValue))
JS !equality
changes["propertyName"].currentValue !== changes["propertyName"].previousValue
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (4)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Lodash isEqual
JS equality
Lodash !isEqual
JS !equality
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
one year ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:137.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/137.0
Browser/OS:
Firefox 137 on Mac OS X 10.15
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
Lodash isEqual
7585459.0 Ops/sec
JS equality
1595596928.0 Ops/sec
Lodash !isEqual
7658500.5 Ops/sec
JS !equality
1585677696.0 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark is designed to compare the performance of two approaches: using Lodash for equality checks (`_.isEqual`) and native JavaScript equality checks (`===`). **Options Compared** There are four test cases: 1. **Lodash isEqual**: This test case uses the `_.isEqual()` function from Lodash, a popular utility library for JavaScript. 2. **JS Equality**: This test case uses the native JavaScript `===` operator for equality checks. 3. **Lodash !isEqual**: This test case is the negation of the first test case, using `!(_.isEqual())`. 4. **JS !Equality**: This test case uses the native JavaScript `!==` operator for inequality checks. **Pros and Cons** Here's a brief summary: * **Lodash isEqual**: Pros: + Robust implementation with edge cases handled. + Can handle complex data structures, such as arrays and objects. + Part of a larger utility library, which can be useful for other tasks. * Cons: + Adds overhead due to the function call and potential memory allocation. + May not be as optimized for simple equality checks. * **JS Equality**: Pros: + Fast and lightweight, as it only performs a single comparison operation. + Optimized for simple equality checks. * Cons: + Does not handle complex data structures or edge cases. + Can lead to unexpected behavior if not used carefully (e.g., when using `===` with objects). **Library and Syntax** In this benchmark, Lodash is a JavaScript utility library that provides a set of functions for common tasks, such as array manipulation, string formatting, and equality checks. The `_.isEqual()` function is specifically designed to compare two values for equality. There are no special JS features or syntax used in this benchmark. All tests rely on standard JavaScript functionality. **Other Alternatives** If you're looking for alternatives to Lodash, some popular options include: * **Immer**: A library for managing state changes in immutable applications. * **Ramda**: Another utility library similar to Lodash, with a focus on functional programming principles. * **Built-in JavaScript methods**: For simple equality checks, the built-in `===` and `!==` operators are often sufficient. For more complex data structures or edge cases, you may want to consider libraries like: * **lodash-es**: A modern implementation of Lodash, designed for ES6+ compatibility. * **Array.prototype.some()`, `Array.prototype.every()`: Built-in methods for working with arrays. * **Set and Map data structures**: For efficient storage and lookup of unique values.
Related benchmarks:
_.isEmpty vs Array.length
_.isEmpty vs. Array.length
Lodash.isEqual vs JSON.stringify Equality Comparison for Shallow Array of Strings. Testing 123
_.isEmpty vs Array.length long array
Lodash.isEqual vs JSON.stringify Equality Comparison for 1000 length array
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?