Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator 1986
(version: 0)
Compare the new ES6 spread operator with the traditional concat() method
Comparing performance of:
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Array.prototype.concat
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]; var other = [ 1, 2 ].concat(params);
spread operator
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ] var other = [ 1, 2, ...params ]
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Array.prototype.concat
spread operator
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared options, pros and cons of each approach, library usage, special JavaScript features or syntax, and other considerations. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark compares the performance of two approaches for merging arrays: the traditional `Array.prototype.concat()` method and the new ES6 spread operator (`...`). The benchmark is designed to test which approach is faster. **Options Compared** Two options are being compared: 1. **`Array.prototype.concat()`**: This is a traditional JavaScript method for concatenating arrays. It takes an array as an argument and returns a new array with all elements from the original array plus any additional elements. 2. **Spread Operator (`...`)**: Introduced in ES6, the spread operator allows you to expand an iterable (such as an array) into individual arguments. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** * `Array.prototype.concat()`: + Pros: widely supported, well-documented, and easy to use. + Cons: can be slower due to the overhead of creating a new array. * Spread Operator (`...`) : + Pros: more concise, faster execution, and easier to read. + Cons: requires ES6 support, and might not work in older browsers. **Library Usage** None of the benchmark tests use external libraries. However, it's worth noting that some JavaScript engines might require additional dependencies for certain features or optimizations. **Special JavaScript Features or Syntax** The spread operator (`...`) is a special syntax introduced in ES6. It allows you to expand an iterable into individual arguments, making it easier to merge arrays and objects. **Other Considerations** * The benchmark uses a fixed array size of 3 elements (`var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ];`). * The benchmark only tests the concatenation operation; other operations (e.g., merging arrays with `+=`) are not considered. * The benchmark does not account for potential issues like null or undefined values in the input data. **Alternatives** Other alternatives to compare would include: * Using a different array size or distribution of elements. * Adding more test cases, such as: + Merging arrays with different types (e.g., objects, strings). + Using other concatenation methods (e.g., `Array.prototype.reduce()`). + Measuring performance under specific conditions (e.g., memory constraints, concurrency). Keep in mind that the benchmark is designed to test the spread operator vs. `Array.prototype.concat()`, so additional alternatives would require changing the scope of the benchmark. In summary, the benchmark tests the performance difference between using the traditional `Array.prototype.concat()` method and the new ES6 spread operator for merging arrays. The results indicate that the spread operator is faster in this specific case, but it's essential to consider other factors like browser support, use cases, and additional testing scenarios.
Related benchmarks:
Array.prototype.concat vs Spread operator
concat 2 arrays: Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator real
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator on large array
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator on small array
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?