Benchmark: lodash.isFinite vs native isFinite

HTML Preparation code:

<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

var value = 3.4514616;

Tests:

lodash
_.isFinite(value);
native
isFinite(value);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
lodash
native

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 10 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/137.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 137 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
lodash	165645024.0 Ops/sec
native	187575440.0 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the benchmark and its components.

**Benchmark Definition**

The benchmark is designed to compare two ways of checking if a value is finite in JavaScript:

1. Using Lodash's `_.isFinite()` function.
2. Using the built-in `isFinite()` method of JavaScript.

**Options Compared**

We're comparing the performance of these two approaches on a specific input value: `3.4514616`.

The options being compared are:

* `_.isFinite()` (Lodash's implementation)
* `isFinite()` (JavaScript's built-in method)

**Pros and Cons of Each Approach**

1. **Lodash's _.isFinite()**: This approach uses the Lodash library, which is a popular utility library for JavaScript. The pros of using this function are:
	* It provides a consistent and predictable behavior across different browsers and platforms.
	* It's often easier to read and understand than implementing the logic manually.
	* However, it adds extra overhead due to the library's existence and initialization time.
2. **JavaScript's isFinite()**: This approach uses the built-in method provided by JavaScript. The pros of using this method are:
	* It's a native implementation, so it doesn't add any external dependencies or overhead.
	* It provides a lightweight and efficient way to check for finiteness.

However, there are also some cons:

* The behavior might vary across different browsers and platforms due to differences in their implementations.
	* It might require more effort to understand the implementation and potential variations.

**Library: Lodash**

Lodash is a popular utility library for JavaScript that provides a lot of useful functions for tasks like string manipulation, array processing, and object transformation. In this benchmark, `_.isFinite()` is used to check if a value is finite.

The purpose of using Lodash in this benchmark is to provide a consistent and predictable behavior across different browsers and platforms. By using a well-established library like Lodash, the test can focus on comparing the performance of two specific approaches without worrying about the implementation details.

**Special JS Feature/Syntax**

There doesn't seem to be any special JavaScript features or syntax being used in this benchmark. The tests are simply calling the `isFinite()` method on a value and measuring the execution time.

Overall, this benchmark provides a good way to compare the performance of two approaches for checking finiteness in JavaScript: using Lodash's `_.isFinite()` function versus the built-in `isFinite()` method.

Related benchmarks:

lodash.isFinite vs native isFinite (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: lodash vs native

Created: 6 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

lodash

native

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):