Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
lodash vs es6 in some method
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
lodash some method vs es6 some method
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
Script Preparation code:
var array = [ { 'name': 'lim', 'age': 26 }, { 'name': 'kim', 'age': 28 }, { 'name': 'choi', 'age': 32 }, { 'name': 'park', 'age': 21 } ];
Tests:
lodash some method
var result = _.some(array, (arr) => { return arr.age === 32; });
es6 some method
var result = array.some((arr) => { return arr.age === 32; });
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
lodash some method
es6 some method
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
**Benchmark Explanation** The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmark test case on the MeasureThat.net website. The test compares two approaches to check if an array contains a specific value using the `some()` method: the original ECMAScript 6 (ES6) implementation and Lodash's implementation. **Options Compared** Two options are compared: 1. **Original ES6 implementation**: This is the native JavaScript implementation of the `some()` method, which was introduced in ES6. 2. **Lodash's implementation**: This is a utility library developed by Isaac Schlueter that provides an additional `some()` function for working with arrays. **Pros and Cons** * **Native ES6 implementation:** + Pros: - Built-in functionality, no external dependency - Optimized for performance + Cons: - May not be as readable or maintainable due to its concise syntax - Not compatible with older browsers that don't support ES6 * **Lodash's implementation:** + Pros: - More readable and maintainable code structure - Can be useful for developers who prefer a more explicit approach + Cons: - Adds an external dependency (the Lodash library) - May have a slight performance overhead due to the function call **Library Usage** In this benchmark, the `lodash` library is used in its full form, specifically importing the entire `lodash.min.js` file. The `lodash` library provides various utility functions, including the `some()` method. **Special JS Features or Syntax** There are no special JavaScript features or syntax mentioned in this benchmark that would require a deep understanding of advanced concepts. **Other Alternatives** If you prefer not to use Lodash, other alternatives for the `some()` function include: * Using the native array methods `every()` and `some()` together: `array.some((arr) => arr.every((item) => item !== 32));` * Creating a custom function to achieve the same result * Using a third-party library like **Underscore.js**, which provides similar functionality to Lodash Keep in mind that these alternatives may have different performance characteristics and usage scenarios. **Benchmark Preparation Code** The `Script Preparation Code` section sets up an array of objects with an "age" property. The `Html Preparation Code` section imports the `lodash.min.js` file, making it available for use in the benchmark tests. By analyzing this JSON data, you can understand that the benchmark compares two approaches to checking if an array contains a specific value using the `some()` method: the original ES6 implementation and Lodash's implementation.
Related benchmarks:
lodash vs es6 in find method
lodash vs es6 in forEach method
lodash vs es6 in every method
lodash vs es6 in find method 2
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?