Benchmark: Lodash ceil vs Math.ceil

HTML Preparation code:


<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.7.11/lodash.min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

function getRandomInt(max) {
  return Math.floor(Math.random() * Math.floor(max));
}

var arr = [];
for(var i = 0; i < 1000; i++){
  arr.push({value:getRandomInt(100)});
}

Tests:

_.max
_.ceil(arr);
Math.max
Math.ceil(...arr)

Historical Performance Data aggregated from 7 community runs

Desktop Results:

Chrome 7 runs

Math.max

1.5M/s

_.max

30K/s

Fastest: Math.max (51.0x faster)

View exact numbers

✓ Math.max: 1,526,401 ops/sec
• _.max: 29,937 ops/sec

Results show median performance across all community submissions. Run this benchmark yourself to verify on your device.

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
_.max
Math.max

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 11 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/139.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 139 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Math.max

1.8M/s

_.max

47K/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ Math.max	1,754,854 Ops/sec
_.max	46,991 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

I'll break down the benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared, and their pros and cons.

**Benchmark Overview**

The benchmark compares two approaches to calculate the maximum value in an array: `_.ceil(arr)` (using Lodash) and `Math.ceil(...arr)` (using built-in JavaScript).

**Options Compared**

1. **Lodash (`_.max`)**: The first option uses the `_.max` function from Lodash, a popular utility library for JavaScript.
2. **Built-in JavaScript (`Math.max`)**: The second option uses the built-in `Math.max` function.

**Pros and Cons of Each Approach**

1. **Lodash (`_.max`)**:
	* Pros:
		+ Easier to read and maintain, especially for complex calculations or multiple iterations.
		+ Provides a consistent interface for various mathematical operations.
	* Cons:
		+ Requires an additional library (Lodash), which may add overhead.
		+ May be slower due to the function call overhead.
2. **Built-in JavaScript (`Math.max`)**:
	* Pros:
		+ Faster, as it doesn't incur the function call overhead.
		+ Lightweight and efficient, with no additional library dependencies.
	* Cons:
		+ Less readable or maintainable for complex calculations or multiple iterations.

**Library: Lodash**

Lodash is a popular utility library for JavaScript that provides a comprehensive set of functions for various tasks, such as array manipulation, string processing, and more. The `_.max` function in this benchmark calculates the maximum value in an array by applying the `Math.max` function to each element.

**Special JS Feature/Syntax: None**

There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in this benchmark.

**Other Alternatives**

If you need to calculate the maximum value in an array, other alternatives exist:

1. **Array.prototype.reduce()**: You can use the `reduce()` method on the array to find the maximum value.
2. **Array.prototype.forEach()**: You can iterate over the array using a `forEach` loop and keep track of the maximum value found so far.

Keep in mind that these alternatives may have different performance characteristics compared to the Lodash or built-in JavaScript approaches.

I hope this explanation helps you understand the benchmark and its options!

Lodash ceil vs Math.ceil (version: 0) Benchmark.js

Comparing performance of: `_.max vs Math.max`

Created: 6 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

_.max

Math.max

Historical Performance Data aggregated from 7 community runs

Desktop Results:

Chrome 7 runs

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

Lodash ceil vs Math.ceil (version: 0) Benchmark.js

Comparing performance of: _.max vs Math.max

Created: 6 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

_.max

Math.max

Historical Performance Data aggregated from 7 community runs

Desktop Results:

Chrome 7 runs

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `_.max vs Math.max`