Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Reduce/Spread vs ReduceRight/push
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
reduce and spread vs lodash reduceRight vs reduce and push
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
Script Preparation code:
var data = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,0]
Tests:
reduce and spread
data.reduce((acc, d) => [{val: d}, ...d], []);
lodash reduceRight
_(data).reduceRight((acc, d) => { acc.push({val: d}); return acc; } , []);
reduce and push
data.reduce((acc, d) => { acc.push({val: d}); return acc; }, []).reverse();
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
reduce and spread
lodash reduceRight
reduce and push
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the provided benchmarking setup. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark, hosted on MeasureThat.net, tests three approaches for reducing an array of objects with different methods: using `reduce`, `reduceRight`, and `push` in combination with array spread. The goal is to measure the performance differences between these approaches. **Script Preparation Code** The script preparation code provides a sample data set, `data`, which consists of an array of integers from 0 to 9, repeated twice: ```javascript var data = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,0]; ``` This data set is used as input for the three benchmarking approaches. **Html Preparation Code** The html preparation code includes a reference to the Lodash library, version 4.17.5: ```javascript <script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script> ``` Lodash is a popular utility library that provides various functions for tasks like array manipulation, iteration, and more. **Benchmarking Approaches** There are three benchmarking approaches: 1. **Reduce**: This approach uses the `reduce` method to iterate over the input data set and accumulate the results in an accumulator (`acc`) array. 2. **Lodash ReduceRight**: This approach uses Lodash's `reduceRight` function, which iterates over the input data set from right to left (i.e., last element first) and accumulates the results in an accumulator (`acc`) array. 3. **Reduce + Push**: This approach combines the `reduce` method with the `push` method to accumulate the results in a new array. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** Here's a brief summary of each approach: * **Reduce**: * Pros: Simple, intuitive syntax; works well for flat arrays. * Cons: Can be less efficient than other approaches when dealing with nested or complex data structures. * **Lodash ReduceRight**: * Pros: Allows for iterative processing from right to left, which can lead to better performance in some cases. Provides a concise syntax using Lodash's utility functions. * Cons: Requires an external library (Lodash) and may have a higher overhead due to the additional dependency. * **Reduce + Push**: * Pros: Combines the benefits of both approaches, providing flexibility for accumulating results in different ways. Can be more efficient than using `reduce` alone when dealing with large arrays or nested data structures. * Cons: May have a higher overhead due to the use of the `push` method and potential memory allocation issues. **Library Usage** Lodash is used as an external library to provide the `reduceRight` function, which is used in the second benchmarking approach. This allows users to leverage Lodash's optimized implementation for array reduction operations. **Special JS Features or Syntax** None of the provided benchmarking approaches use any special JavaScript features or syntax that would affect their performance significantly. **Alternative Approaches** Some alternative approaches could be explored: * **Using `map` and `concat`**: Instead of using `reduce`, you could use the `map` method to transform each element into an object with a value property, and then concatenate these objects using the `concat` method. * **Using `forEach`**: You could iterate over the input data set using the `forEach` method and accumulate the results in an accumulator array. * **Using a custom loop**: A simple loop can be used to iterate over the input data set, accumulating the results in an accumulator array.
Related benchmarks:
Lodash reduce with native reduce
lodash range vs Array.from vs keys() + spread
Lodash reduce vs native
Lodash reduce vs native (testing)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?