Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Lodash.js versus Native
(version: 1)
Comparing performance of:
Native filter vs Lodash.js filter vs Native map vs Lodash.js map vs Native reduce vs Lodash.js reduse
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/lodash@4.17.4/lodash.min.js"></script>
Script Preparation code:
let maxNum = 10000000; // 10,000,000 (10 Million) var arr = []; for (let i = 0; i <= maxNum; i++) { arr.push(i); }
Tests:
Native filter
arr.filter((i) => i % 2 === 0);
Lodash.js filter
_.filter(arr,(i) => i % 2 === 0);
Native map
arr.map((i) => i + 1 );
Lodash.js map
_.map(arr,(i) => i + 1 );
Native reduce
arr.reduce((sum, i) => sum + i, 0)
Lodash.js reduse
_.reduce(arr, (sum, i) => sum + i, 0)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (6)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Native filter
Lodash.js filter
Native map
Lodash.js map
Native reduce
Lodash.js reduse
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark and its results. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark compares the performance of two approaches: 1. **Native**: The native JavaScript implementation, which uses the built-in array methods (e.g., `filter`, `map`, `reduce`) without any additional libraries or modifications. 2. **Lodash.js**: The Lodash library, a popular utility library for JavaScript that provides various functions and helpers for tasks like filtering, mapping, and reducing arrays. **Options Compared** The benchmark compares the performance of: * `filter` and `_.filter` (Lodash.js equivalent) * `map` and `_.map` (Lodash.js equivalent) * `reduce` and `_.reduce` (Lodash.js equivalent) **Pros and Cons** Here's a brief summary of the pros and cons of each approach: * **Native**: + Pros: No additional dependencies, no performance overhead due to library loading. + Cons: Can be slower than optimized library implementations. * **Lodash.js**: + Pros: Optimized for performance, handles edge cases, and provides additional functionality. + Cons: Adds dependency on the Lodash library, which can impact load times. **Library (Lodash)** Lodash is a popular utility library that provides various functions and helpers for tasks like: * Array manipulation (`filter`, `map`, `reduce`) * String manipulation (`upperCase`, `lowerCase`) * Object manipulation (`clone`, `merge`) * Function manipulation (`curry`, `bindall`) Lodash aims to provide a small, modular set of functions that can be easily combined to achieve complex tasks. **Special JavaScript Feature** There is no special JavaScript feature or syntax mentioned in the benchmark. However, it's worth noting that some modern browsers have optimized implementations of array methods, such as `filter` and `map`, which can impact performance. **Other Alternatives** If you're looking for alternative libraries to Lodash, consider: * **Underscore.js**: Another popular utility library that provides many of the same functions as Lodash. * **Lo-Dash**: A minimalist implementation of Lodash's API, optimized for smaller payloads. * **Native implementations only**: If performance is critical, using native JavaScript methods without any additional libraries can be a good option. In summary, the benchmark compares the performance of native JavaScript implementations versus Lodash.js for common array operations. While native implementations may have some overhead due to library loading, Lodash.js provides optimized implementations with additional functionality and edge case handling.
Related benchmarks:
Native vs Lodash.js contains
Lodash.js vs Native isArrary
Lodash.js vs Native _.min
Lodash.js wrapper vs js native
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?