Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Nathan C Function vs Obj literal
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Function Benchmark vs Object benchmark
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Function Benchmark
function returnName(name) { if (name === '1Y') { return 'oneYearRor'; } if (name === '3Y') { return 'threeYearRor'; } if (name === '5Y') { return 'fiveYearRor'; } if (name === '10Y') { return 'tenYearRor'; } if (name === 'SI') { return 'sinceInceptionRor'; } if (name === 'YTD') { return null; } }; returnName('5Y') returnName('10Y') returnName('1Y') returnName('SI') returnName('YTD')
Object benchmark
const obj = { '1Y': 'oneYearRor', '3Y': 'threeYearRor', '5Y': 'fiveYearRor', '10Y': 'tenYearRor', 'SI': 'sinceInceptionRor', 'YTD': null }; obj['5Y'] obj['10Y'] obj['1Y'] obj['SI'] obj['YTD']
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Function Benchmark
Object benchmark
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
**What is being tested?** The provided JSON represents two test cases for measuring the performance of JavaScript benchmarks: 1. **Function Benchmark**: This test case measures the execution time of a function that returns different strings based on input parameters. The function has multiple if-else statements to determine the return value. 2. **Object Benchmark**: This test case measures the execution time of an object literal that accesses its properties using bracket notation. **Options being compared** In this benchmark, two options are being compared: * **Function Approach**: The first option uses a traditional function with if-else statements to determine the return value. * **Object Literal Approach**: The second option uses an object literal with bracket notation to access its properties. **Pros and Cons of each approach** 1. **Function Approach** * Pros: + Easier to understand and maintain for developers familiar with traditional function syntax. + Can be more flexible in terms of logic and control flow. * Cons: + May lead to slower execution times due to the overhead of function calls and returns. + More memory usage compared to object literals. 2. **Object Literal Approach** * Pros: + Faster execution times since it avoids the overhead of function calls and returns. + Less memory usage compared to traditional functions. * Cons: + May be less intuitive for developers unfamiliar with bracket notation. **Library used** In neither test case is a specific JavaScript library being tested. However, it's worth noting that some browsers may optimize certain JavaScript features or syntax, which could affect the benchmark results. **Special JS feature/syntax** There are no special JS features or syntax being tested in this benchmark. The test cases use standard JavaScript syntax for functions and object literals. **Other alternatives** If you were to extend this benchmark, you could consider adding additional test cases that explore other JavaScript approaches, such as: * Using a closure or a higher-order function * Leveraging modern JavaScript features like async/await or arrow functions * Comparing performance with different optimization techniques (e.g., caching, memoization) Keep in mind that the specific alternatives will depend on your goals and requirements for the benchmark.
Related benchmarks:
Object Literal vs Object as Function
obj assign setproto
object assign setproto create
obj inheritance create assign setproto
testasdfasdfasdf
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?