Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
split vs regex match
(version: 0)
split vs regex match
Comparing performance of:
split vs regex match
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var str = 'emoji22';
Tests:
split
str.split('emoji');
regex match
str.match(/emoji(\d+)/);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
split
regex match
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided JSON and explain what's being tested, compared, and considered. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is called "split vs regex match" and has two test cases: "split" and "regex match". The goal is to compare the performance of using `str.split()` versus regular expressions (`str.match()`) for a specific task. **Script Preparation Code and HTML Preparation Code** The script preparation code is simple: `var str = 'emoji22';\r\n`. It sets a string variable named `str` to contain the text `'emoji22'`. There's no HTML preparation code provided, which means this benchmark doesn't test rendering or layout-related performance. **Library and Purpose** One of the libraries used in these benchmarks is likely JavaScript itself, as it's not explicitly mentioned. However, `str.match()` relies on the built-in JavaScript regular expression (regex) engine. No external library is necessary for these tests. **Special JS Features or Syntax** There are a few special features at play here: 1. **String split() method**: This method takes an argument that's expected to be a string. If no arguments are provided, it returns the original array of strings. 2. **Regular Expressions (Regex)**: The `str.match()` function uses regex to search for patterns in the input string. **Comparison Options** We have two options being compared: 1. **`str.split('emoji')`**: This splits the string into an array of substrings, using `'emoji'` as the separator. 2. **`str.match(/emoji(\\d+)/)`**: This searches for a pattern in the input string, specifically `emoji` followed by zero or more digits (`\\d+`). **Pros and Cons** Here are some pros and cons for each approach: 1. **`str.split('emoji')`**: * Pros: Fast, efficient, and easy to understand. * Cons: May not be as flexible or powerful as regex, and it only works if the separator is a string literal. 2. **`str.match(/emoji(\\d+)/)`**: * Pros: More flexible, can match more complex patterns, and still relatively fast. * Cons: Can be slower than `split()` for simple cases, and may have higher overhead due to regex engine usage. **Other Considerations** When choosing between these two approaches, consider the following: 1. **Readability**: If you need to understand the code easily, `str.split()` might be a better choice. 2. **Flexibility**: If you need to match more complex patterns or handle edge cases, regex (`str.match()`) might be a better fit. 3. **Performance**: For simple cases, `str.split()` is likely to be faster. **Alternatives** Other alternatives could include: 1. Using a dedicated regex library (e.g., esregex) for more advanced regex functionality. 2. Implementing custom string splitting logic using loops or other data structures. 3. Using a different approach altogether, such as using `indexOf()` and slicing the string instead of `split()`. However, since this benchmark is focused on comparing two simple approaches (`str.split()` vs regex), these alternatives might not be relevant to the specific use case being tested.
Related benchmarks:
String split vs Regex 02
Split vs regexp
Regex vs Split Time
string.split(RegExp); vs string.split(string);
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?