Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
jquery compare
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
$jq1124 vs $jq224 vs $jq331 vs $jq341
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.12.4/jquery.min.js'></script> <script> var $jq1124 = $.noConflict(true); </script> <script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.2.4/jquery.min.js"></script> <script> var $jq224 = $.noConflict(true); </script> <script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.3.1/jquery.min.js"></script> <script> var $jq331 = $.noConflict(true); </script> <script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.4.1/jquery.min.js"></script> <script> var $jq341 = $.noConflict(true); </script> <div> <ul id="menu"> <li class="menu-item">1</li> <li class="menu-item">2</li> <li class="menu-item">3</li> <li class="menu-item">4</li> </ul> </div>
Script Preparation code:
function tests($) { $(".menu-item").eq(2).closest("ul").css({ "background-color": "red" }).parent().css({ "border": "1px solid blue" }).append($("<p></p>").text("Text.").css({ "background-color": "green" })).end().end().remove(); console.log('tests' + $); }
Tests:
$jq1124
tests($jq1124);
$jq224
tests($jq224);
$jq331
tests($jq331);
$jq341
tests($jq341);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (4)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
$jq1124
$jq224
$jq331
$jq341
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down what's being tested in the provided benchmark. **Benchmark Definition** The `Script Preparation Code` defines a function `tests($) { ... }` that takes jQuery as an argument, `$`. The function performs several operations on an HTML document with a `<ul>` element and its child elements. Specifically, it: 1. Sets the background color of the second element's closest `ul` element to red. 2. Sets the border of the parent element to 1px solid blue. 3. Appends a new paragraph element with some styles to the end of the `ul` element. 4. Removes all elements from the document. The `Html Preparation Code` includes multiple versions of jQuery, each with `$.noConflict(true)` called before it's assigned to a variable (e.g., `$jq1124`, `$jq224`, etc.). **Options Compared** There are four test cases that compare different versions of jQuery: 1. jQuery 1.12.4 (`$jq1124`) 2. jQuery 2.2.4 (`$jq224`) 3. jQuery 3.3.1 (`$jq331`) 4. jQuery 3.4.1 (`$jq341`) These test cases aim to measure the performance difference between these four versions of jQuery. **Pros and Cons** Here are some pros and cons for each version of jQuery: * **jQuery 1.12.4**: This is an older version, which might be less efficient than newer versions. + Pros: May have fewer dependencies or conflicts with other libraries. + Cons: Might not support modern JavaScript features or be compatible with newer browsers. * **jQuery 2.2.4**: Another older version, which might also have performance advantages due to reduced dependencies. + Pros: Similar to jQuery 1.12.4. + Cons: Less efficient than newer versions. * **jQuery 3.3.1**: A more modern version with improved performance and new features (e.g., promise support). + Pros: Generally faster and more efficient than older versions. + Cons: May have increased dependencies or conflicts with other libraries. * **jQuery 3.4.1**: The latest version, which likely includes the most recent performance improvements and feature updates. + Pros: Typically the fastest and most efficient version. + Cons: May introduce new dependencies or conflicts. **Libraries Used** None, but jQuery is used as a library in this benchmark. **Special JS Features/Syntax** There are no special JavaScript features or syntax mentioned in this benchmark. The focus is on comparing different versions of jQuery. **Other Alternatives** If you're interested in testing alternative libraries for DOM manipulation, some popular options include: * Vanilla JavaScript (using only the built-in DOM methods) * React * Angular * Vue.js Keep in mind that each library has its own strengths and weaknesses, and this benchmark is specifically focused on comparing different versions of jQuery. I hope this explanation helps!
Related benchmarks:
Lodash isEqual vs Lodash difference
_.isEqual vs for loop on Number Array
queryselector vs getelementbyid with classes and ids
While loop parentElement vs closest (vanilla javascript)
array.from.map vs array.from with map
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?