Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
spread vs for
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
spread vs for
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
spread
var n = 1000000; [...Array(n).keys()];
for
var n = 1000000; var a = []; for (var i = 0; i < n; i++) { a.push(i); }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
spread
for
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to explain the benchmark and its results in detail. **Benchmark Description** The benchmark measures the performance difference between using the spread operator (`[...Array(n).keys()]`) versus traditional `for` loop to generate an array of numbers from 0 to `n-1`. The benchmark is designed to test which approach is faster, more efficient, and scalable for large inputs. **Options Compared** Two options are compared: 1. **Spread Operator (`[...Array(n).keys()`)**: This method uses the spread operator to create a new array of numbers from 0 to `n-1`. The `keys()` function returns an iterator that generates numbers starting from 0. 2. **Traditional `for` Loop**: This method uses a traditional `for` loop to iterate over a range of numbers and push them into an array. **Pros and Cons** **Spread Operator:** Pros: * More concise and expressive code * Faster execution, as it avoids the overhead of creating an iterator object Cons: * May not be as readable or maintainable for developers who are not familiar with modern JavaScript features * Can be slower in older browsers that don't support the spread operator **Traditional `for` Loop:** Pros: * More traditional and familiar syntax, making it easier to understand and maintain * Works in older browsers that don't support the spread operator Cons: * Longer code snippet, which can make it harder to read and understand * Slower execution due to the overhead of creating an iterator object (in modern browsers) **Other Considerations** * **Browser Support**: The spread operator is supported by most modern browsers, while older browsers may not support it. * **Readability and Maintainability**: The choice between these two options depends on the desired trade-off between conciseness and readability. **Library or Special JS Feature Used** In this benchmark, no library is used. However, if a library were needed to help with array generation or iteration, some popular alternatives could be: * Lodash (e.g., `lodash.range()`) * Ramda (e.g., `ramda/from`) * Array.from() **Special JS Features or Syntax** The spread operator (`[...Array(n).keys()]`) is a modern JavaScript feature that allows for concise array creation. It was introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6) and has since become widely supported. The traditional `for` loop syntax remains the same, but it uses an older style of iteration that is still widely understood and used. **Other Alternatives** If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches to generating arrays or iterating over ranges, here are some other options: * Using `Array.from()` with a callback function * Using a library like Lodash or Ramda * Implementing your own custom array generation or iteration functions For this benchmark, the spread operator has been chosen for its concise and expressive syntax, as well as its relatively fast execution speed.
Related benchmarks:
lodash.round VS toFixed() VS toFixed() and parseFloat
lodash.round VS toFixed() VS parseFloat().toFixed()
toFixed() vs Math.round().toString()
float vs tofixed (kostian)
parseFloat(toFixed) vs Math.round()
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?