Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
push vs direct access
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
push vs direct access
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
push
const arr = [1,2,3,4,5]; arr.push(6);
direct access
const arr = [1,2,3,4,5]; arr[5] = 6;
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
push
direct access
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Measuring the performance of different approaches can be crucial in JavaScript development, especially when it comes to optimizing code for various use cases. **Benchmark Definition** The provided JSON represents a benchmark definition with two test cases: `push` and `direct access`. The script preparation code is empty, which means that the test scripts will be created automatically based on the benchmark definitions. There's also no HTML preparation code specified, so the tests will likely be run in a default or blank environment. **Options Compared** The two options being compared are: 1. **`arr.push(6);`**: This approach uses the `push()` method to add an element to the end of an array. 2. **`arr[5] = 6;`**: This approach uses direct array indexing to modify the element at a specific index. **Pros and Cons** Both approaches have their advantages and disadvantages: * **`arr.push(6);`**: + Pros: concise, easy to read, and maintain. + Cons: can be slower due to the overhead of pushing a new element onto the array. * **`arr[5] = 6;`**: + Pros: potentially faster since it only modifies an existing element without creating a new one. + Cons: more verbose, error-prone if the index is out of bounds. The choice between these two approaches depends on the specific use case and performance requirements. If concise code is preferred, `arr.push(6);` might be the better option. However, if speed is crucial, using direct indexing with caution to avoid errors. **Library** In this benchmark, there's no explicitly mentioned library. It appears that the test scripts are intended to run in a standard JavaScript environment without any additional dependencies. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** There doesn't seem to be any special JavaScript feature or syntax being used in these tests beyond the standard `push()` and array indexing techniques. **Other Alternatives** Some alternative approaches for adding elements to an array include: * **`Array.prototype.splice()`**: This method is similar to `arr.push(6);`, but it's more flexible since it can insert, replace, or remove elements at specific indices. * **`Array.from()` and `push()` combination**: Instead of using the `push()` method directly, you could create a new array using `Array.from()` and then push elements onto it. This approach might offer better performance in some cases. Keep in mind that these alternative approaches are not necessarily included in this specific benchmark, but they demonstrate other ways to manipulate arrays in JavaScript.
Related benchmarks:
Spread operator vs array push
Array .push() vs .unshift() vs spread
Pushing items via Array.push vs. Spread Operator
spread vs push - simple
Spread vs Push when adding into array
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?