Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Floor Min
(version: 1)
Comparing performance of:
Floor first vs Min First vs Inline If
Created:
9 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var a = 14543630892.678034; var b = 23445842646.499996;
Tests:
Floor first
Math.min(Math.floor(a), Math.floor(b));
Min First
Math.floor(Math.min(a, b));
Inline If
Math.floor( a < b ? a : b )
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Floor first
Min First
Inline If
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down what's being tested in this benchmark. **Benchmark Definition** The `Script Preparation Code` section defines two variables, `a` and `b`, which are assigned some large numbers. This code is executed before running the benchmark tests. **Test Cases** There are three test cases: 1. **Floor first**: This test uses the mathematical function `Math.floor()` directly on `a` and `b`. The order of operations is determined by the JavaScript interpreter, so this test checks how `Math.floor()` behaves with respect to integer division. 2. **Min First**: Similar to the previous test, but instead of using the `Math.min()` function separately, it's used as part of a larger expression that first finds the minimum value between `a` and `b`, and then applies `Math.floor()`. 3. **Inline If**: This test uses an inline if statement with a ternary operator to check which variable is smaller and apply `Math.floor()` accordingly. **Library and Purpose** None of these tests use any external libraries, so there's no additional context to provide. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in these test cases that require explanation. The focus is on the behavior of the built-in `Math` functions and operators. **Pros and Cons of Approaches** 1. **Floor first**: This approach tests the behavior of `Math.floor()` as a standalone function, which might be useful for developers who need to optimize code related to integer division. * Pros: Can provide insight into the behavior of `Math.floor()` under specific conditions. * Cons: May not accurately represent real-world usage scenarios where `Math.floor()` is used in conjunction with other functions or operators. 2. **Min First**: This approach tests the combined behavior of `Math.min()` and `Math.floor()`, which might be more representative of how these functions are typically used together. * Pros: Can provide a more realistic representation of how these functions interact. * Cons: May introduce additional overhead due to the extra function call. 3. **Inline If**: This approach uses an inline if statement, which can be useful for performance-critical code paths. * Pros: Can potentially improve performance by avoiding the overhead of a separate `Math.min()` function call. * Cons: May make the code harder to read and maintain due to its concise form. **Other Alternatives** There are several other approaches that could have been taken: 1. Using a different function, such as `Number(a) < Number(b)` instead of an inline if statement. 2. Adding additional inputs or edge cases to test the behavior of `Math.floor()` under different conditions (e.g., negative numbers, NaN values). 3. Testing the behavior of `Math.floor()` in a specific context, such as when used with other mathematical functions like exponentiation (`Math.pow()`). Keep in mind that the choice of approach ultimately depends on the goals and requirements of the benchmarking project.
Related benchmarks:
Truncating a number to an integer
fast floor vs floor js vs unsafe floor
Test floor
JS BigInt big number performance vx4
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?