Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
44Object.assign vs spread operator irekqq
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Object.assign vs spread operator
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Object.assign
var params = { b:"hello", c: true, d:7 }; var other = Object.assign({ok: 4}, params);
spread operator
var params = { b:"hello", c: true, d:7 }; const obj = { ok: 4 }; var other = { obj, ...params };
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Object.assign
spread operator
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided JSON and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark compares two approaches to merge an object with another object: `Object.assign` and the spread operator (`...`). **Options Compared** 1. **`Object.assign`**: This method takes multiple objects as arguments and merges them into a new object, overriding any existing properties. 2. **Spread Operator (`...`)**: This syntax allows you to create a new object by spreading an existing object's properties into it. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** * `Object.assign`: + Pros: Simple, widely supported, and easy to use. + Cons: Can be slower than the spread operator due to the overhead of method calls and property lookups. * Spread Operator (`...`): + Pros: Fast, concise, and modern syntax. + Cons: Not as widely supported (although gaining popularity) and may require explicit type definitions. **Library/Functionality Used** In this benchmark, `Object.assign` is a built-in JavaScript function. The spread operator (`...`) is a feature introduced in ECMAScript 2018 (ES2018). **Special JS Feature/Syntax** The spread operator (`...`) is the special syntax being compared here. **Other Considerations** * Performance: The spread operator is generally faster than `Object.assign` due to its ability to avoid method calls and property lookups. * Readability: `Object.assign` can be less readable due to the use of a function call, while the spread operator is more concise and modern. * Browser Support: While both approaches are supported by most modern browsers, the spread operator may not be as widely supported in older versions or non-standard browsers. **Alternative Approaches** For merging objects, other alternatives include: 1. `Object.assign` with object destructuring: `{ ...params }` 2. Function call with string interpolation: `Object.create(null).assign(params)` 3. Using a library like Lodash's `merge` function However, the spread operator (`...`) is currently the most concise and efficient way to merge objects in modern JavaScript.
Related benchmarks:
Division by 1000 vs bitwise shifting approximation (1024)
floor() vs trunc() vs bitwise hacks (~~, >> 0, etc) 2
Number constructor vs double tilde
floor vs trunc vs bit shift
Flooring with different Bitwise operators Fixed
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?