Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator no jq
(version: 0)
Compare the new ES6 spread operator with the traditional concat() method
Comparing performance of:
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Array.prototype.concat
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]; var other = [ 1, 2 ].concat(params);
spread operator
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ] var other = [ 1, 2, ...params ]
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Array.prototype.concat
spread operator
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Purpose:** The benchmark is designed to compare two approaches for concatenating arrays in JavaScript: 1. The traditional `Array.prototype.concat()` method 2. The new ES6 spread operator (`...`) **Options Compared:** * `concat()`: A built-in JavaScript method that takes one or more arrays as arguments and returns a new array containing all the elements from the original arrays. * Spread operator (`...`): A new syntax introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6) for creating a new array by spreading the elements of an existing array. **Pros and Cons:** * `concat()`: Pros: + Well-established and widely supported + Can handle any type of array element, not just primitive values Cons: + Less readable code when dealing with multiple arrays + May lead to performance issues if dealing with large arrays * Spread operator (`...`): Pros: + More concise and readable code + Efficient for small to medium-sized arrays Cons: + Not supported in older browsers (before ES6) + May not work as expected when dealing with complex array structures **Library Usage:** There is no explicit library mentioned in the benchmark definition or test cases. However, it's worth noting that some libraries like Lodash may provide additional utility functions for array manipulation, which could potentially impact performance. **Special JS Feature/Syntax:** The spread operator (`...`) was introduced as a new syntax in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). This means that older browsers and environments may not support it out of the box. However, since Chrome 77 is mentioned as a benchmarking browser, it's likely that this browser supports ES6 features. **Alternative Approaches:** Other approaches for concatenating arrays include: * Using `Array.prototype.push()` in a loop * Using `Array.prototype.concat()` with an array of arrays * Using a library like Lodash or Ramda for more advanced array manipulation Keep in mind that the choice of approach depends on the specific use case and performance requirements. I hope this explanation helps you understand what's being tested in the benchmark!
Related benchmarks:
Array.prototype.concat vs Spread operator
concat 2 arrays: Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator (fix)
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator on large array
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator on small array
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?