Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator v2
(version: 0)
Compare the new ES6 spread operator with the traditional concat() method
Comparing performance of:
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Array.prototype.concat
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]; var other = [ 1, 2 ].concat(params);
spread operator
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ] var other = [ 1, 2, ...params ]
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Array.prototype.concat
spread operator
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the details of this JavaScript microbenchmark. **Benchmark Purpose:** The benchmark is designed to compare two ways of concatenating arrays in JavaScript: 1. The traditional `Array.prototype.concat()` method. 2. The new ES6 spread operator (`...`). **Options Compared:** Two options are being compared: * Option 1: `Array.prototype.concat()` + This method takes an array and another array as arguments and returns a new array that contains all elements from both arrays. * Option 2: Spread operator (`...`) + This operator is used to expand an iterable (such as an array) into individual elements, which can be used in the `arguments` list of a function or as an array literal. **Pros and Cons:** Here are some pros and cons for each approach: **Array.prototype.concat():** Pros: * Well-supported by most browsers and engines * Can handle large arrays efficiently * Allows for flexibility in concatenating arrays Cons: * Requires creating a new array object, which can be memory-intensive for very large arrays * May incur overhead due to function call and array creation **Spread Operator (`...`):** Pros: * More concise and expressive than `concat()` * Can be more efficient for small to medium-sized arrays * Reduces the need for explicit array creation Cons: * Not as widely supported by older browsers or engines (although it's been added in ES6, older versions may not support it) * May incur overhead due to function call and argument parsing **Library/Functionality:** There is no library or external functionality being used in this benchmark. It's a straightforward comparison between two native JavaScript features. **Special JS Features/Syntax:** The spread operator (`...`) is a special feature introduced in ES6 (ECMAScript 2015). It allows for more concise and expressive array literals, as well as other iterable types like `Object`. **Other Alternatives:** If the spread operator was not an option, other alternatives could include: * Using `Array.prototype.push()` to add elements one by one * Creating a new array using `Array constructor` or `Array.from()` * Using `Object.assign()` to concatenate arrays (although this method has limitations and is not as efficient) Keep in mind that the choice of approach depends on the specific use case, performance requirements, and compatibility concerns. I hope this explanation helps! Let me know if you have any further questions.
Related benchmarks:
concat 2 arrays: Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator (fix)
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator real
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator on large array
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator on small array
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?