Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
testeqwewqq
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
attribution vs conditional attribution
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var flag=false, index = 0;
Tests:
attribution
while(index < 100000) { flag = true; index ++; }
conditional attribution
while(index < 100000) { if(!flag) flag = true; index ++; }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
attribution
conditional attribution
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll break down the benchmark and its results for you. **Benchmark Overview** The MeasureThat.net benchmark measures the performance of two simple while-loops in JavaScript, which are executed repeatedly to test their execution speed. **Script Preparation Code** ```javascript var flag = false; index = 0; ``` This code initializes two variables: `flag` and `index`. The purpose of these variables is not explicitly stated in the benchmark definition, but based on the use cases, it appears that: * `flag` is used to conditionally set a boolean value inside the while-loop. * `index` is used as a counter variable to control the loop iteration. **Html Preparation Code** This field is empty, which means no additional HTML code is required for the benchmark. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition consists of two individual test cases: 1. **"attribution"**: This test case contains a simple while-loop that sets `flag` to `true` on each iteration. ```javascript while (index < 100000) { flag = true; index++; } ``` 2. **"conditional attribution"**: This test case adds an additional condition inside the while-loop, which only sets `flag` to `true` if `flag` is currently `false`. ```javascript while (index < 100000) { if (!flag) flag = true; index++; } ``` **Library Usage** There are no explicit libraries mentioned in the benchmark definition. **Special JS Features/Syntax** There's one notable feature used in these test cases: the use of a **boolean shortcut assignment**. In JavaScript, when assigning a value to a variable that already holds a boolean value, it will be coerced to `true` if assigned `true` and `false` if assigned `false`. This is demonstrated in both benchmark definitions. **Benchmark Results** The latest benchmark results show the execution speed of each test case across multiple devices: 1. **"conditional attribution"**: 11944393.0 executions per second 2. **"attribution"**: 11813152.0 executions per second The results suggest that the conditional statement introduces a slight overhead, making "attribution" slightly faster. **Alternative Approaches** If you were to write this benchmark yourself, here are some alternative approaches: 1. **Use a more robust timing library**: MeasureThat.net uses a built-in timer, but in a real-world scenario, you might want to consider using a more accurate timing library like `performance.now()` or `Date.now()`. 2. **Increase the iteration count**: Both test cases iterate 100,000 times, which might not be sufficient to reveal performance differences between simple while-loops. 3. **Add more complex conditions**: To better showcase performance differences, you could introduce additional conditions, such as conditional statements within nested loops or more complex logical operations. 4. **Compare with other languages**: MeasureThat.net primarily focuses on JavaScript. You could extend the benchmark by comparing performance across different programming languages. Keep in mind that this is a simple benchmark designed to demonstrate basic while-loop performance. Real-world applications often involve more complex scenarios, making it essential to consider additional factors like cache behavior, memory allocation, and optimization techniques when measuring performance.
Related benchmarks:
if !== or ===
if !== or === v2
null checking
var1!==null vs var1!==undefined vs var1!=="x"
true vs false
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?