Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
array join vs string concate again
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
join vs concate
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
join
let year = '2019'; let month = '12'; let day = '20'; let str = [year, month, day].join('-');
concate
let year = '2019'; let month = '12'; let day = '20'; let str = year+'-'+month+'-'+day;
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
join
concate
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll break down the explanation into sections to make it easier to understand. **Benchmark Definition** The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmark test case, where two different approaches are compared: using `String.join()` and concatenating strings manually (`+` operator). The test case is designed to measure the performance difference between these two methods when joining three string values into one. **Options Compared** Two options are being compared: 1. **Using `String.join()`**: This method joins multiple strings together by inserting a specified separator (in this case, a hyphen `-`) between each string. 2. **Manual concatenation using the `+` operator**: This approach involves concatenating three strings together manually using the `+` operator. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** Here are some pros and cons of each approach: 1. **Using `String.join()`**: * Pros: More concise and readable code, reduces chance of human error. * Cons: May not be suitable for older browsers or environments that don't support `join()`, as it's a modern method. 2. **Manual concatenation using the `+` operator**: * Pros: Widely supported by older browsers and environments, easier to understand for developers familiar with this syntax. * Cons: More verbose code, increases chance of human error. **Library Used** In this test case, no libraries are explicitly mentioned. However, it's worth noting that `String.join()` is a built-in method in JavaScript, so no library is required to use it. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** No special JavaScript features or syntax are used in these test cases. They only involve basic string concatenation and the `join()` method. **Other Alternatives** If you want to measure the performance of other string concatenation methods, you could consider using: 1. **Template literals**: Introduced in ECMAScript 2015, template literals provide a more concise way to concatenate strings. 2. **Regular expressions**: Some developers might use regular expressions for string manipulation, although this approach is generally less efficient than simple concatenation or `join()`. Keep in mind that these alternatives are not as straightforward as using `+` or `join()`, and their performance may vary depending on the specific use case and browser/environment. I hope this explanation helps!
Related benchmarks:
.join vs string builder vs string concatenation
String concatenation vs array join precise
String concatenation vs array join preciselarge
string concat + join vs unshift + join
string array join vs for loop concatenation
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?