Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
split vs regex hw1
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
reg vs split
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var str = '09:11:20';
Tests:
reg
var a = str.match(/(?:[0-5]?[0-9])?(?:[0-5]?[0-9])/g); var b = a[0];
split
var a = str.split(':'); var b = a[0];
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
reg
split
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks! **What is being tested?** The provided JSON represents two individual test cases for a benchmark named "split vs regex hw1". The test case uses a string `str` that contains time in the format `HH:MM:SS`. Two different approaches are compared: 1. **Regex** (`reg` test case) 2. **String splitting** (`split` test case) **Options being compared** * For the Regex approach: + Using regular expressions with grouping and quantification (e.g., `(?:[0-5]?[0-9])?(?:[0-5]?[0-9])` * For the String splitting approach: + Splitting the string at the colon (`:`) character **Pros and cons of each approach** **Regex:** Pros: * Can be more flexible and powerful for certain tasks * Often faster than string splitting for simple cases * Can handle multiple patterns in a single regular expression Cons: * Can be slower for complex or large inputs due to compilation overhead * May require more code and maintenance compared to string splitting * Can lead to "regex fallacy" if not used carefully **String Splitting:** Pros: * Generally faster than regex for simple cases, as it avoids compilation overhead * Easier to read and maintain, especially for short strings or simple patterns * Less prone to errors due to the simplicity of the operation Cons: * Limited flexibility compared to regex * May not work well with complex or large inputs * Requires more manual effort to handle edge cases or multiple splits **Other considerations** * The test case uses a specific string format (`HH:MM:SS`) that might affect the performance and accuracy of both approaches. * The Regex approach is using a non-capturing group (`(?:`) to avoid capturing the leading zero in the time values. This can be an edge case, as it requires careful consideration when working with regex. **Library or special JS feature used** None are mentioned in this specific benchmark. **Special JS feature or syntax** The Regex approach uses a JavaScript-specific feature called "quantification" (e.g., `[0-5]?[0-9]`) which allows for specifying a range of values. This is not unique to the regex language, but rather a part of JavaScript's regular expression syntax. **Other alternatives** Alternatives to these approaches include: * Using a dedicated library like ` moment.js` for date and time parsing * Employing more advanced techniques like using a regular expression with lookbehinds or character classes Keep in mind that the choice of approach depends on the specific requirements of your project, including performance, readability, and maintainability.
Related benchmarks:
String split vs Regex 02
Regex vs split/join on simple case
regex vs split lucas ribeiro
.split(" ") vs .split(/\s+/)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?