Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
array vs jsobject
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
array vs jsobj
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
array
let a = [0] a[0]
jsobj
obj = {a: 0} obj["a"]
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
array
jsobj
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down what's being tested in the provided benchmark. **What is being tested?** The test compares the execution performance of two approaches: 1. **Array indexing**: The first approach uses arrays, specifically the syntax `a[0]` to access and modify an element at index 0. 2. **JS object property access**: The second approach uses JavaScript objects, specifically the syntax `obj["a"]` to access and modify a property named "a". **Options compared** The two options being compared are: * Array indexing (`a[0]`) * JS object property access (`obj["a"]`) **Pros and Cons of each approach:** 1. **Array indexing (a[0])**: * Pros: + Faster execution due to the optimized nature of array indices. + Less memory overhead since arrays are a fundamental data structure in JavaScript. * Cons: + More verbose syntax, which can lead to slower performance due to the additional parsing time. 2. **JS object property access (obj["a"])**: * Pros: + Less verbose syntax compared to array indexing, making it faster to write and parse. * Cons: + Slower execution due to the overhead of traversing the object's properties. + More memory overhead since objects require more memory than arrays for storing data. **Other considerations:** * **Cache performance**: Modern browsers cache frequently accessed elements in arrays, which can lead to better performance. However, this effect is less pronounced when using JS objects due to their inherent complexity. * **Native support**: Array indexing is natively supported in JavaScript and is often optimized by the browser engine. **Library usage:** There doesn't appear to be any external library used in these benchmark test cases. **Special JS feature or syntax:** Neither of the tested approaches relies on a specific, non-standard JavaScript feature. However, if we consider the use of property access (`obj["a"]`), it involves using bracket notation, which is a standard but less common approach compared to dot notation (e.g., `obj.a`). **Alternatives:** If you wanted to test other approaches, here are some alternatives: * **Using dot notation**: Instead of `obj["a"]`, use `obj.a`. This is often faster due to the reduced overhead of property traversal. * **Using object literals**: Instead of creating objects with bracket notation (`obj = { a: 0 }`), use object literals like `{ a: 0 }`. This can be slightly faster due to the optimized creation process. Keep in mind that these alternatives may not provide a significant difference in performance for this specific benchmark, and the test's focus remains on comparing array indexing versus JS object property access.
Related benchmarks:
Array.from() vs []
Array.from() vs new Array() - empty
Array.from() vs new A
Array() vs Array.from() fill
Array.from() vs new Array() with index
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?