Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Array.prototype.slice vs spread operator1234321
(version: 0)
Compare the new ES6 spread operator with the traditional slice() method
Comparing performance of:
Array.prototype.slice vs spread operator
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Array.prototype.slice
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]; var other = params.slice();
spread operator
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ] var other = [ ...params ]
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Array.prototype.slice
spread operator
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Definition:** The benchmark compares two approaches for creating a copy of an array: 1. The traditional `Array.prototype.slice()` method. 2. The new ES6 spread operator (`[ ...params ]`). **What are the options being compared?** The benchmark is comparing the performance of these two approaches in creating a shallow copy of an array. **Pros and Cons:** * **`Array.prototype.slice()`**: + Pros: - Widely supported across browsers and JavaScript engines. - Well-established and understood by developers. + Cons: - Can be slower than the spread operator for large arrays due to the overhead of calling a method on an array. * **Spread Operator (`[ ...params ]`)**: + Pros: - Newer and faster approach compared to `slice()`. - Provides a more concise way of creating copies of arrays. + Cons: - Not yet widely supported across browsers and JavaScript engines (although it's gaining popularity). - May not work as expected in older versions of Firefox or other browsers. **Library:** In this benchmark, the `Array.prototype.slice()` method is a built-in part of the ECMAScript specification. The spread operator (`[ ...params ]`) is also a built-in feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). **Special JS Feature/Syntax:** There are no special features or syntax used in this benchmark, as it only involves comparing two well-established approaches. **Other Considerations:** * The benchmark does not account for the case where the original array is modified while the copy is being used. In such cases, using `slice()` might be more suitable to avoid potential issues. * The spread operator might not work correctly with arrays containing non-primitive values (e.g., objects or functions) due to its shallow copying nature. **Alternatives:** If you're looking for alternative ways to create copies of arrays in JavaScript, some other options include: 1. `Array.from()`: Creates a new array from an iterable object, which can be used with arrays. 2. `Array.prototype.concat()`: Concatenates one or more arrays into a new array, creating a deep copy by default (although it's not as efficient as the spread operator). 3. Third-party libraries like Lodash (`_.clone()`), Underscore (`_.clone()`), or other array utilities. Keep in mind that each of these alternatives has its own trade-offs and considerations, depending on your specific use case and requirements.
Related benchmarks:
Array.prototype.slice vs spread operator with length limit
Array.prototype.slice vs spread operator With slightly bigger array
Array.prototype.slice vs spread operator on a bigger array
Array.prototype.slice vs spread operator - large array 100000
Array.prototype.slice vs spread operator performance
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?