Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Find the stray v3
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
stray_happy vs stray_heretic vs stray_shaye vs stray_user vs stray_eric
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
function stray_happy(numbers) { numbers = numbers.sort((a, b) => a - b); if (numbers[0] !== numbers[1]) { return numbers[0]; } else { return numbers[numbers.length - 1]; } } function stray_heretic(numbers) { return numbers.find(i => numbers.filter(j => j === i).length === 1); } function stray_shaye(numbers) { return +numbers.sort((a, b) => a - b) .filter((n,i,a) => (i === 0 && a[0] !==a[1]) || (i === a.length-1 && a[a.length-1] !== a[a.length-2])); } function stray_user(a) { return a.find(v => a[0] != a[1] ? v != a[2] : v != a[0]) } function stray_eric(numbers) { if (numbers[0] != numbers[1] && numbers[0] != numbers[2]){ return numbers[0]; } return numbers.find(i => i !== numbers[0]); } N = 100 var numbers = Array(N).fill(1); numbers[Math.floor(Math.random()*N)] = 2;
Tests:
stray_happy
var n = stray_happy(numbers)
stray_heretic
var n = stray_heretic(numbers)
stray_shaye
var n = stray_shaye(numbers)
stray_user
var n = stray_user(numbers)
stray_eric
var n = stray_eric(numbers)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (5)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
stray_happy
stray_heretic
stray_shaye
stray_user
stray_eric
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks! **Benchmark Definition JSON** The provided JSON represents a benchmark definition, which outlines the rules and structure for creating a microbenchmark. The main elements are: 1. **Script Preparation Code**: This is the JavaScript code that sets up the test environment, including variables, data structures, and any necessary libraries. 2. **Html Preparation Code**: This section is empty in this example, indicating that no HTML preparation code is required. **Individual Test Cases** The individual test cases are defined in a separate array, each representing a specific benchmark definition. These definitions include: 1. `stray_happy` 2. `stray_heretic` 3. `stray_shaye` 4. `stray_user` 5. `stray_eric` These functions are designed to find the "stray" element in an array of numbers, where a stray element is defined as an element that does not match its adjacent elements. **Library Usage** None of the test cases use any external libraries. However, they do utilize built-in JavaScript features like: * Array methods (e.g., `sort()`, `filter()`) * Functions (e.g., `find()`) **Special JS Features and Syntax** Some test cases use syntax specific to certain browsers or versions of JavaScript. For example: * In `stray_shaye`, the `+` operator is used to convert the result of `sort()` to a number, which might not be the expected behavior in older browsers. * In `stray_user`, the ternary operator (`a[0] != a[1] ? v != a[2] : v != a[0]`) might not be supported in all browsers. **Approaches Compared** The test cases compare different approaches to finding the stray element: 1. **Brute Force**: `stray_heretic` uses the `find()` method with a callback function, which iterates through the array and checks each element against its adjacent elements. 2. **Sorting and Scanning**: `stray_shaye` sorts the array and then scans it to find the stray element. 3. **Manual Iteration**: `stray_happy` and `stray_eric` use manual iteration to find the stray element. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** Here's a brief summary: * Brute Force (`stray_heretic`): + Pros: simple, effective + Cons: may be slower for large arrays due to the extra iteration * Sorting and Scanning (`stray_shaye`): + Pros: efficient for most cases + Cons: assumes that the array is already sorted, which might not always be true * Manual Iteration (`stray_happy`, `stray_eric`): + Pros: more control over the iteration process + Cons: may be slower due to manual iteration **Other Alternatives** There are other approaches to finding the stray element, such as: 1. Using a hash table or map to keep track of adjacent elements. 2. Utilizing browser-specific features like `Array.prototype.at()` (available in modern browsers). 3. Leveraging libraries like Lodash or Underscore.js for utility functions. Keep in mind that these alternatives might introduce additional dependencies, complexity, or performance overhead.
Related benchmarks:
Find the stray
Find the stray v2
Find the stray_eric
Find the stray v2b
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?