Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator forked
(version: 0)
Compare the new ES6 spread operator with the traditional concat() method forked
Comparing performance of:
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Array.prototype.concat
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]; var other = [ 1, 2 ].concat(params);
spread operator
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ] var other = [ 1, 2, ...params ]
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Array.prototype.concat
spread operator
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is designed to compare two approaches for concatenating arrays in JavaScript: the traditional `concat()` method and the new ES6 spread operator (`...`). **Options compared** Two options are being compared: 1. **Array.prototype.concat**: The traditional way of concatenating arrays using the `concat()` method. 2. **Spread operator (`...`)**: A new way of spreading an array's elements into a new array, introduced in ES6. **Pros and Cons** Here's a brief summary of each approach: * **Array.prototype.concat**: + Pros: - Well-established and widely supported - Easy to understand and implement + Cons: - Can be slower due to the overhead of creating a new array and copying elements - May not be as efficient for large datasets * **Spread operator (`...`)**: + Pros: - Faster than `concat()` since it doesn't require creating a new array - More concise and expressive in modern JavaScript code + Cons: - Less widely supported (although becoming increasingly common) - May require more attention to syntax and semantics due to its unique behavior **Library/Library purpose** There is no library explicitly mentioned in the benchmark definition. However, it's worth noting that the spread operator was introduced as a part of the ECMAScript standard, which is maintained by the Ecma International organization. **Special JS feature/syntax** The spread operator (`...`) is a new syntax introduced in ES6, allowing elements to be spread into an array or object. This syntax has become increasingly important for modern JavaScript development. **Other alternatives** If you're looking for alternative approaches to concatenating arrays, here are a few options: * **Array.prototype.push()**: You can use `push()` to add elements to the end of an array and then return the updated array. * **Array.prototype.concat() with Array.from()**: You can convert an iterable (like a string or another array) into an array using `Array.from()` and then concatenate it with your existing array using `concat()`. * **Custom implementation**: Depending on your specific use case, you might be able to implement a custom concatenation function that's more efficient than the built-in `concat()` method. Keep in mind that these alternatives may have different trade-offs in terms of performance, readability, and maintainability compared to the spread operator or `concat()`.
Related benchmarks:
concat 2 arrays: Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator (fix)
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator real
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator on large array
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator on small array
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?