Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Spred add vs slice concat
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Slice concat vs Spread add
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Slice concat
const testArray = [1, 2, 3]; const newTestArray = testArray.concat(4);
Spread add
const testArray = [1, 2, 3]; const newTestArray = [...testArray, 4];
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Slice concat
Spread add
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is designed to compare two approaches for adding an element to an array: using `concat()` and using the spread operator (`...`). **Options Compared** 1. **`concat()`**: The traditional way of concatenating arrays in JavaScript. It creates a new array by copying the elements from both arrays. 2. **Spread Operator (`...`)**: A modern way of creating a new array by spreading the elements of an existing array and adding new elements to it. **Pros and Cons** * **`concat()`**: + Pros: Simple, widely supported, and easy to read. + Cons: Creates a new array object, which can be slower than modifying the original array in-place. It also copies the original array's properties (e.g., length, prototype), which can lead to performance issues with large arrays. * **Spread Operator (`...`)**: + Pros: More concise and expressive, allows for creating a new array without copying the original array's properties. It's also more efficient than `concat()` because it avoids creating a new array object. + Cons: May not be supported in older browsers or environments. **Library Usage** None of the benchmark tests use any external libraries. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** The spread operator (`...`) is used to create a new array. This feature was introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6) and is widely supported in modern JavaScript engines. **Other Considerations** * Performance: The spread operator is generally faster than `concat()` because it avoids creating a new array object. * Memory Usage: Both approaches allocate memory for the new array, but the spread operator is more memory-efficient because it only allocates space for the additional elements. **Alternatives** If you need to compare other approaches for adding an element to an array, consider: 1. Using `push()` instead of `concat()`. 2. Using `unshift()` instead of `concat()` or spread operator. 3. Comparing the performance of different array data structures (e.g., sparse arrays, typed arrays). By understanding these considerations and alternatives, developers can optimize their code for better performance and memory usage when working with JavaScript arrays.
Related benchmarks:
Concat vs Slice
test spread vs concat
Concat vs Slice f1
Array.prototype.concat vs Array.prototype.splice
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?