Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
spread operator vs Object.assign performance vs Manual assignment
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Using the spread operator vs Using Object.assign vs Manual assignment
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Using the spread operator
const firstObject = { sampleData: 'Hello world' } const secondObject = { moreData: 'foo bar' } const finalObject = { ...firstObject, ...secondObject };
Using Object.assign
const firstObject = { sampleData: 'Hello world' } const secondObject = { moreData: 'foo bar' } const finalObject = Object.assign(firstObject, secondObject);
Manual assignment
const firstObject = { sampleData: 'Hello world' } const secondObject = { moreData: 'foo bar' } const finalObject = {}; finalObject.sampleData = firstObject.sampleData; finalObject.moreData = secondObject.moreData;
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Using the spread operator
Using Object.assign
Manual assignment
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared, and their pros and cons. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark measures the performance of three ways to create an object by merging two existing objects: using the spread operator (`...`), `Object.assign()`, and manual assignment (using dot notation). **Options Compared** 1. **Using the Spread Operator (`...`)** * This approach uses the spread operator (`{ ... }`) to merge the properties of two objects. * Pros: + Concise and readable syntax. + Creates a shallow copy of the original object, which can be beneficial for performance in some cases (see below). * Cons: + May not work as expected when dealing with nested objects or complex data structures. 2. **Using `Object.assign()`** * This approach uses the `Object.assign()` method to merge the properties of two objects. * Pros: + Widely supported and well-documented. + Allows for more control over the merging process (e.g., using `Object.assign()` with an array). 3. **Manual Assignment (Dot Notation)** * This approach uses dot notation (`finalObject.sampleData = firstObject.sampleData; finalObject.moreData = secondObject.moreData;`) to merge the properties of two objects. * Pros: + Simple and straightforward syntax. * Cons: + Can be verbose and less readable than other approaches. + Creates a shallow copy of the original object, which can lead to performance issues when dealing with large datasets. **Performance Considerations** When merging objects using these different approaches, it's essential to consider the following factors: * **Shallow vs. Deep Copy**: Using `Object.assign()` or manual assignment creates a shallow copy of the original object, which means that only the top-level properties are copied, and any nested objects or arrays remain unchanged. In contrast, using the spread operator (`...`) creates a new object with a deep copy of all properties. * **Array Merging**: When merging arrays using `Object.assign()` or manual assignment, the resulting array will be a reference to the original arrays. If you want to create a new array with the merged elements, you need to use the spread operator (`...`) or `Array.prototype.concat()`. * **Performance Impact**: The performance impact of these approaches depends on the size and complexity of the data being merged. In general, using the spread operator (`...`) can be faster for large datasets because it creates a new object with a deep copy of all properties. **Library/Feature Usage** None of the test cases use any external libraries or special JavaScript features beyond what's standard in modern browsers. I hope this explanation helps software engineers understand the benchmark and its comparison scenarios!
Related benchmarks:
toFixed() vs Math.round().toString()
another test 2
Math.floor(Math.random() * 1000000000).toString() vs window.performance.now().toFixed()
toFixed vs toPrecision vs Math.round() with constant multiplier
toFixed vs Math.round vs |(bitwise or)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?