Benchmark: Angular 1.5 clone vs Lodash 4.17 cloneDeep vs JSON Clone

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/angularjs/1.5.0/angular.min.js"></script>
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

var MyObject = {
  description: 'Creates a deep copy of source, which should be an object or an array.',
  myNumber: 123456789,
  myBoolean: true,
  jayson: {
    stringify: 'JSON.stringify() method converts a JavaScript value to a JSON string....',
    parse: 'JSON.parse() method parses a JSON string...'
  }
};

var myCopy = null;

Tests:

Lodash cloneDeep
myCopy = _.cloneDeep(MyObject);
Json clone
myCopy = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(MyObject));
Angular copy
myCopy = angular.copy(MyObject);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Lodash cloneDeep
Json clone
Angular copy

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/123.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 123 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Angular copy

2.6M/s

Lodash cloneDeep

1.6M/s

Json clone

1.1M/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ Angular copy	2,639,083 Ops/sec
Lodash cloneDeep	1,615,919 Ops/sec
Json clone	1,125,934 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided benchmark and its test cases.

**Benchmark Overview**

The benchmark compares the performance of three different methods to create a deep copy of an object: Lodash `cloneDeep`, JSON's built-in `stringify` and `parse` methods, and Angular's `copy` method. The benchmark is designed to measure which approach is faster.

**Test Cases**

There are three test cases:

1. **Lodash cloneDeep**: This test case uses the `cloneDeep` function from Lodash to create a deep copy of the `MyObject`. The `cloneDeep` function is used for creating deep copies of objects, arrays, and maps.
2. **JSON Clone**: This test case uses JSON's built-in `stringify` method followed by `parse` method to create a deep copy of the `MyObject`. This approach converts the object to a string, creates a new object from the string, and then parses it back into an object.
3. **Angular Copy**: This test case uses Angular's `copy` function (not explicitly imported in this example) to create a deep copy of the `MyObject`.

**Options Compared**

The benchmark compares the following options:

* Lodash `cloneDeep`
* JSON's built-in `stringify` and `parse` methods
* Angular's `copy` method

**Pros and Cons of Each Approach**

1. **Lodash cloneDeep**: This approach is likely to be the fastest as it is specifically designed for creating deep copies of objects.
	* Pros: Fast, efficient, and widely used.
	* Cons: Requires an external library (Lodash).
2. **JSON Clone**: Using `stringify` and `parse` methods can lead to performance issues due to string conversion and parsing.
	* Pros: No external libraries required.
	* Cons: Slower, less efficient, and may cause issues with certain data structures.
3. **Angular Copy**: The existence of this option is unclear as the Angular code snippet seems incomplete or missing the import statement for `angular.copy`. However, if implemented correctly, it could be a competitive approach.
	* Pros: None are evident in this example.
	* Cons: Possibly slower than Lodash due to its nature and may require more overhead.

**Other Considerations**

The benchmark does not account for other factors that might affect performance, such as:

* Data structure complexity
* Object size and depth
* Memory allocation and garbage collection

It's essential to note that this benchmark is specifically designed to measure the performance of each approach in creating a deep copy of an object, rather than a comprehensive benchmarking exercise.

**Alternatives**

Other alternatives for creating deep copies include:

* For JavaScript objects: `Object.assign({}, obj)`
* For arrays: `Array.prototype.slice.call(arr)`
* For Maps: `new Map([...])`

Each of these approaches has its own trade-offs in terms of performance, readability, and maintainability.

Angular 1.5 clone vs Lodash 4.17 cloneDeep vs JSON Clone (version: 0) Benchmark.js

Comparing performance of: `Lodash cloneDeep vs Json clone vs Angular copy`

Created: 7 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

Lodash cloneDeep

Json clone

Angular copy

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

Angular 1.5 clone vs Lodash 4.17 cloneDeep vs JSON Clone (version: 0) Benchmark.js

Comparing performance of: Lodash cloneDeep vs Json clone vs Angular copy

Created: 7 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

Lodash cloneDeep

Json clone

Angular copy

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `Lodash cloneDeep vs Json clone vs Angular copy`