Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Array constructor vs literal
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Array constructor - 10 items vs Array literal - 10 items
Created:
9 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Array constructor - 10 items
var n = 10; var arr = new Array(n); for (var i = 0; i < n; i++) { arr[i] = i; }
Array literal - 10 items
var n = 10; var arr = []; for (var i = 0; i < n; i++) { arr.push(i); }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Array constructor - 10 items
Array literal - 10 items
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Measuring the performance of JavaScript array creation using either the `new Array` constructor or an array literal is a fundamental benchmarking exercise. **What's being tested?** In this case, two different approaches are compared: 1. **Array constructor**: This involves creating an array by invoking the `Array` constructor with an integer argument, which specifies the initial length of the array. 2. **Array literal**: This involves initializing an empty array using square brackets `[]` and then pushing elements onto it using the `push()` method. **Options compared:** The two approaches have different characteristics that affect their performance: * **Overhead**: Creating an array with a constructor requires more overhead than creating one using an array literal. The constructor must allocate memory, initialize the internal array structure, and perform other tasks before returning control to the caller. * **Performance**: For small arrays, the difference in performance is often negligible. However, for larger arrays, the array literal approach tends to be faster due to its simpler creation process. **Pros and Cons:** **Array constructor:** Pros: * Can be more convenient when creating arrays with a specific initial length. * May be more suitable for situations where the array needs to have a specific structure or properties. Cons: * Requires more overhead, which can impact performance for large arrays. * May incur additional costs due to memory allocation and internal array initialization. **Array literal:** Pros: * Faster creation time, especially for larger arrays. * More lightweight, with less overhead compared to the constructor approach. Cons: * Can be more error-prone if not used correctly (e.g., forgetting to initialize the array length). * May require additional code to ensure the array is properly initialized and populated. **Library usage:** In this benchmark, neither library is explicitly mentioned. However, some JavaScript engines may use libraries like V8 (used by Google Chrome) or SpiderMonkey (used by Mozilla Firefox) that provide optimized implementations for common tasks, including array creation. **Special JS feature/syntax:** None are mentioned in the provided benchmark definitions.
Related benchmarks:
Array constructor vs literal performance, 12345
subarray vs. constructor perf
instanceof Array vs Array.isArray
Populate array: array literal vs array constructor
new TypedArray() vs TypedArray.of()
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?