Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
String.proptotype.split vs spread operator
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
split from String vs split with spread operator
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
split from String
const someString = 'some string detected'; const splittedStr = someString.split('');
split with spread operator
const someString = 'some string detected'; const splittedStr = [...someString];
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
split from String
split with spread operator
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks. **What is being tested?** The provided benchmark tests the performance difference between two approaches for splitting a string in JavaScript: 1. `String.prototype.split('')`: This method splits a string into an array of substrings using a regular expression with an empty string as the separator. 2. Spread operator (`[...]`): This syntax creates a new array from the elements of a string. **Options compared** The benchmark compares these two approaches, which can be considered as different optimization strategies: * **String splitting**: The first approach uses `String.prototype.split('')`, while the second approach uses the spread operator. Both methods have their own strengths and weaknesses. * **Regular expressions vs. simple iteration**: The first approach uses a regular expression with an empty string as the separator, which is not very efficient. In contrast, the spread operator simply iterates over each character in the string to create the array. **Pros and cons of each approach** 1. **String.prototype.split('')**: * Pros: Simple and widely supported. * Cons: + Not very efficient due to the use of regular expressions. + Can be slower than the spread operator for large strings. 2. **Spread operator (`[...]`)**: * Pros: + More efficient, especially for large strings. + Simple and easy to implement. * Cons: + May not work as expected in all situations (e.g., Unicode characters). + Less widely supported than `String.prototype.split('')`. **Library and purpose** There is no specific library used in this benchmark. However, the spread operator relies on the **Array constructor**, which creates a new array from an iterable. **Special JS feature or syntax** The use of the spread operator (`[...]`) introduces a special JavaScript feature called **Destructuring assignment**. This syntax allows for creating a new array by iterating over each element of a string, assigning it to individual elements in the resulting array. Other alternatives Some alternative approaches for string splitting could be: * Using `String.prototype.split()` with a non-empty separator (e.g., `" "`). * Using `String.fromCharCode()` and indexing into the resulting code unit values. * Using a library like **Lodash** or **Underscore.js**, which provide more efficient string manipulation methods. Keep in mind that these alternatives may not be as simple to implement or may have different performance characteristics compared to the spread operator.
Related benchmarks:
Array.prototype.slice vs spread operator fixed
Array.prototype.slice vs spread operator copy
Array.prototype.slice vs spread operator different syntax
Array.prototype.slice vs spread operator1
Array.prototype.slice vs spread operator - fixed
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?