Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
removeOuterParentheses1
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
a vs b
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
a
const removeOuterParentheses = S => { let par = ""; let l = 1; let count = 0; for (let i = 0; i < S.length; i++) (S[i] === "(" ? ++count : --count) || ((par += S.substring(l, i)), l = i + 2); return par; }; removeOuterParentheses("(()())(())(()(()))");
b
const removeOuterParentheses = S => { const par = [-1]; let count = 0; for (let i = 0; i < S.length; i++) (S[i] === "(" ? ++count : --count) || par.push(i); for (let i = 0; i < par.length - 1; i++) count += S.substring(par[i] + 2, par[i + 1]); return count.slice(1); }; removeOuterParentheses("(()())(())(()(()))");
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
a
b
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and its test cases. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark measures the performance of two different implementations of the `removeOuterParentheses` function, which takes a string `S` as input and returns the substring without outermost parentheses. The function is implemented in JavaScript. **Options Compared** The two options compared are: 1. **Option A**: This implementation uses a simple iterative approach to parse the input string and build the output substring. 2. **Option B**: This implementation uses an array-based approach, where it stores indices of parentheses in an array `par` and then constructs the output substring by concatenating substrings between these indices. **Pros and Cons** **Option A**: * Pros: + Simple to understand and implement + Does not rely on external data structures (arrays) * Cons: + May be slower due to manual indexing and string manipulation **Option B**: * Pros: + Can potentially be faster due to optimized string concatenation + Uses a more modern approach with arrays, which can be beneficial for performance * Cons: + Requires an additional data structure (array) to store indices of parentheses + May have higher overhead due to array manipulation **Other Considerations** Both implementations use JavaScript syntax and do not rely on special features or libraries beyond standard JavaScript functionality. However, the second implementation (Option B) uses a more advanced data structure (arrays), which may affect its performance in certain scenarios. **Library/Utility Functions Used** None of the provided benchmark code snippets explicitly use external library functions. The `S` variable is assumed to be a string input, and the implementations rely on built-in JavaScript functionality for parsing and manipulating strings. **Special JS Features/Syntax** There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in these implementations beyond standard JavaScript functionality. **Alternatives** Some alternative approaches that could be considered for this benchmark include: 1. Using regular expressions to parse the input string. 2. Implementing a more advanced data structure, such as a trie, to store and retrieve substring indices. 3. Using a parallel processing or multi-threaded approach to execute both implementations concurrently. These alternatives may offer performance benefits in certain scenarios but would require significant changes to the benchmark code and implementation details.
Related benchmarks:
Array Remove vs String Replace
replaces
Character removal
regex vs filter
regex vs filter 2
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?