Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
jQuery versus Vanilla JS GetID Speed Test
(version: 0)
Comparing speed of getting element by id with jQuery vs Vanilla JS
Comparing performance of:
Vanilla getElementById(id) vs Vanilla querySelector(#id) vs Vanilla querySelectorAll(#id) vs jQuery(#id)
Created:
7 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="//code.jquery.com/jquery-3.4.1.slim.min.js"></script> <div id="fixed-id"></div>
Tests:
Vanilla getElementById(id)
var el = document.getElementById("fixed-id"); var className = el.className;
Vanilla querySelector(#id)
var el = document.querySelector('#fixed-id'); var className = el.className;
Vanilla querySelectorAll(#id)
var el = document.querySelectorAll('#fixed-id'); var className = el.className;
jQuery(#id)
var el = $("#fixed-id"); var className = el.className;
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (4)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Vanilla getElementById(id)
Vanilla querySelector(#id)
Vanilla querySelectorAll(#id)
jQuery(#id)
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the explanation of the benchmark and its options. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is designed to compare the speed of retrieving an element by ID using two approaches: jQuery and Vanilla JavaScript. **Options Compared** 1. **Vanilla `getElementById`**: This method uses the `document.getElementById()` function, which returns the first element with the specified ID. 2. **Vanilla `querySelector`**: This method uses the `document.querySelector()` function, which returns the first element that matches the specified CSS selector. 3. **Vanilla `querySelectorAll`**: This method uses the `document.querySelectorAll()` function, which returns a NodeList of all elements that match the specified CSS selector. 4. **jQuery**: This method uses jQuery's `$` function to select the element with the specified ID. **Pros and Cons** 1. **Vanilla `getElementById`**: * Pros: Simple, widely supported, and efficient for retrieving a single element by ID. * Cons: May not be as flexible as other methods (e.g., `querySelectorAll`) or suitable for complex queries. 2. **Vanilla `querySelector`**: * Pros: More flexible than `getElementById`, allowing for more complex CSS selectors. Can also be used to retrieve multiple elements at once. * Cons: May have slower performance compared to `getElementById` due to the complexity of the selector. 3. **Vanilla `querySelectorAll`**: * Pros: Allows retrieving all elements that match a CSS selector, making it suitable for complex queries or large datasets. * Cons: May be slower than `getElementById` due to the overhead of processing multiple elements. 4. **jQuery**: * Pros: Provides a convenient and concise way to select elements using CSS selectors. Can also be used for DOM manipulation. * Cons: Adds an extra dependency (the jQuery library) and may introduce unnecessary complexity compared to Vanilla JavaScript. **Library: jQuery** The `$(` symbol is a part of the jQuery library, which provides a simplified way to interact with the DOM. In this benchmark, jQuery's `$` function is used to select elements by ID. **Special JS Feature/ Syntax: `#id`** This is a CSS selector notation that selects an element by its ID. It is not specific to any particular JavaScript library or feature. **Other Alternatives** 1. **Vanilla `querySelector` with attribute selectors**: Instead of using the `id` attribute, you can use other attribute selectors like `[attribute="value"]` or `[attribute ~='value']`. 2. **CSS attributes**: You can also retrieve elements by CSS attributes like `style`, `class`, or `content-attr`. In summary, this benchmark provides a straightforward comparison of four methods for retrieving an element by ID: Vanilla JavaScript's `getElementById`, `querySelector`, and `querySelectorAll` methods, and jQuery's `$` function. The results can help users understand the performance differences between these approaches and make informed decisions about which method to use depending on their specific use case.
Related benchmarks:
jQuery by id vs Document.getElementById
Simple Test of Finding Document Element by Id
jQuery 3.3.1 slim by id vs Document.getElementById
jQuery vs getElementById vs querySelector vs $(getElementById) jquery 3.6.3
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?