Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Array.prototype.slice Versus Spread Operator
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
slice vs spread
Created:
7 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
slice
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]; var other = params.slice();
spread
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]; var other = [...params];
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
slice
spread
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared, and their pros/cons. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is comparing two ways to create a copy of an array in JavaScript: using `Array.prototype.slice()` and the spread operator (`...`). The script preparation code is empty, which means it only contains the test cases. There are no HTML-related codes provided for the benchmark setup. **Options Being Compared** There are two options being compared: 1. **`Array.prototype.slice()`**: This method creates a shallow copy of an array by iterating over its elements and returning a new array with the same elements. 2. **Spread Operator (`...`)**: This operator creates a new array by spreading out the elements of an existing array. **Pros/Cons of Each Approach** * **`Array.prototype.slice()`**: + Pros: Easy to use, works well for small arrays, and is generally faster than the spread operator. + Cons: Can be slow for large arrays (O(n)), as it needs to iterate over each element. Additionally, it creates a new array object, which can lead to increased memory usage. * **Spread Operator (`...`)**: + Pros: More concise and expressive than `Array.prototype.slice()`, works well for small to medium-sized arrays, and is generally faster than `slice()` for large arrays (O(1)). + Cons: Can be slower than `slice()` for very large arrays, as it needs to create a new array object. Additionally, modern JavaScript engines have optimized the spread operator, making it more efficient. **Library Used** None explicitly mentioned in this benchmark definition, but it's worth noting that some browsers may use internal implementation details or polyfills for the spread operator. **Special JS Feature/Syntax (Not applicable)** No special JavaScript features or syntax are used in this benchmark. **Other Considerations** * The benchmark measures the execution speed of both approaches on each test case. It's essential to note that the benchmark's results might vary depending on the specific use case and array size. * For very large arrays, other factors like memory usage, cache efficiency, or parallelization might become more significant than mere speed differences between `slice()` and the spread operator. **Alternative Benchmarks** Other benchmarks could compare: * Other methods for creating array copies, such as `Array.from()`, `Buffer.copy()`, or `Uint8Array.slice()`. * Different array sizes (e.g., very small arrays, massive arrays with millions of elements). * Performance variations between different browsers, versions, or architectures. * Effects of adding additional data structures or computations before the array copy operation. Keep in mind that the choice of benchmark depends on specific use cases and performance considerations.
Related benchmarks:
Array.prototype.slice vs spread operator.
Array.prototype.slice vs spread operator with length limit
Array.prototype.slice vs spread operator With slightly bigger array
Array.prototype.slice vs spread operator on a bigger array
Array.prototype.slice vs spread operator - large array 100000
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?