Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Lodash.get vs Lodash.property
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Lodash get vs _property
Created:
7 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/lodash/4.16.0/lodash.min.js"></script>
Script Preparation code:
var person = {name: 'Frederick', lastName: 'Corcino Alejo'}; var p = _.property("name");
Tests:
Lodash get
_.get(person, 'name');
_property
p(person);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Lodash get
_property
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
one year ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/134.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 134 on Mac OS X 10.15.7
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
Lodash get
47018536.0 Ops/sec
_property
182373408.0 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided JSON and explain what's being tested. **What is being tested?** The benchmark measures the performance difference between two approaches: using Lodash's `get` method versus using `property`. Both methods are used to access properties within an object. **Options compared:** 1. **Lodash's `get` method**: This method retrieves a value from an object by its key path. 2. **Lodash's `_property` function**: This function returns a getter function for a property on the given object. **Pros and Cons of each approach:** 1. **Lodash's `get` method:** * Pros: + More flexible, as it can handle complex key paths. + Can be used with nested objects. * Cons: + May have slower performance due to the overhead of parsing the key path. 2. **Lodash's `_property` function:** * Pros: + Faster performance since it simply returns a getter function, which is cached. + More lightweight compared to `get`. * Cons: + Less flexible than `get`, as it only supports direct property access. **Library and its purpose:** Lodash is a popular utility library for JavaScript. The `_property` function is part of Lodash's "utility functions" collection, providing a way to create getter functions for specific properties on objects. **Special JS feature or syntax:** None mentioned in this benchmark. **Other alternatives:** For accessing properties within an object, other approaches could be used without relying on Lodash. For example: 1. **Brute-force method**: Using a simple loop to iterate over the object's properties and find the desired one. 2. **Using `in` operator**: Accessing the property using the `in` operator, like `person["name"]`. 3. **Using a library like FastJSON** (not directly relevant here but can be used in similar scenarios). Keep in mind that these alternatives might not offer the same level of convenience and flexibility as Lodash's `get` or `_property` methods. It's worth noting that, for simple property access, using a direct dot notation (`person.name`) is often the fastest approach, as it bypasses any overhead from function calls or caching. However, when dealing with more complex scenarios, Lodash's utility functions can provide a convenient and readable way to solve problems.
Related benchmarks:
Lodash.get vs Property dot notation
Lodash.get vs Property dot notation with sanity check
lodash._get vs Property dot notation
Lodash.get vs Property dot notation @movlan
Lodash.get vs Property dot notation with ?
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?