Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator vs push 2
(version: 0)
Compare the new ES6 spread operator with the traditional concat() method and push
Comparing performance of:
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator vs Push
Created:
7 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Array.prototype.concat
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]; var other = [ 1, 2 ].concat(params);
spread operator
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ] var other = [ 1, 2, ...params ]
Push
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]; params.push(1); params.push(2);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Array.prototype.concat
spread operator
Push
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared, and their pros and cons. **Benchmark Overview** The test compares three different ways to concatenate arrays in JavaScript: 1. `Array.prototype.concat()` 2. The spread operator (`...`) 3. The `push()` method with multiple assignments **Options Compared** Here are the options being compared, along with a brief description of each: ### 1. `Array.prototype.concat()` * Syntax: `arr.concat(other)` * Purpose: Concatenates two arrays and returns a new array. * Pros: + Widely supported across browsers. + Can be used to concatenate multiple arrays at once. * Cons: + Creates a new array object, which can lead to performance issues for large datasets. + Not as concise as other options. ### 2. The Spread Operator (`...`) * Syntax: `[ ...arr ]` * Purpose: Creates a new array by spreading the elements of another array. * Pros: + Very concise and readable. + Does not create a new array object, making it more efficient than `concat()`. * Cons: + Not supported in older browsers (pre-ES6). + Can lead to performance issues if used with large datasets. ### 3. The `push()` method with multiple assignments * Syntax: `arr.push(...other)` * Purpose: Appends new elements to an array and returns the updated length of the array. * Pros: + Very concise and readable. + Does not create a new array object, making it more efficient than `concat()`. * Cons: + Not as widely supported across browsers (Chrome 73+). + Can lead to performance issues if used with large datasets. **Library and Special JS Features** In this benchmark, the library being used is none. However, the spread operator (`...`) is a relatively new JavaScript feature introduced in ES6. **Benchmark Preparation Code and HTML Preparation Code** The provided JSON does not contain any preparation code for the test. It's likely that the preparation code is already set up by MeasureThat.net or another tool used to run this benchmark. **Other Alternatives** If you're looking for alternatives to these options, here are a few: * `Array.prototype.slice()`: A more traditional way of concatenating arrays, which creates a new array object. * `Set.concat()` or `Set.from([...])`: For combining sets instead of arrays. * Library functions like Lodash's `_.concat()` or `_.union()` for more complex data manipulation. Keep in mind that these alternatives may not be as efficient or concise as the options being compared in this benchmark.
Related benchmarks:
concat 2 arrays: Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator (fix)
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator real
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator on large array
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator on small array
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?